-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 13k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Test case fixes #6115
Closed
Closed
Test case fixes #6115
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
…t flag for the cycle collector
this test case has rotted wrt modern syntax. fortunately, this issue was a dup of another one, and that one still ICEs.
First, it refers to a feature (trait bounds on type parameters) that's apparently no longer in the language. Second, if I understand the issue correctly, it should never have been a "run-pass" test because it was supposed to fail.
I've done a slapdash job of fixing up the syntax; it didn't pass before, and it doesn't pass now, but at least it parses...
bors
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
May 1, 2013
In developing the grammar a few weeks ago, I fixed up a bunch of test cases that had rotted to the point that they didn't parse.
flip1995
pushed a commit
to flip1995/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Oct 9, 2020
Add changelog for 1.48 beta [Rendered](https://github.com/ebroto/rust-clippy/blob/changelog_1_48/CHANGELOG.md) I've not added the PRs fixing `same_item_push` because those were backported, namely: * [rust-lang#5908](rust-lang/rust-clippy#5908) * [rust-lang#5997](rust-lang/rust-clippy#5997) * [rust-lang#6016](rust-lang/rust-clippy#6016) The following PR was reverted, so I've ignored it too: * [rust-lang#5984](rust-lang/rust-clippy#5984) ~~Also, I took the liberty of adding a "Thanks" section, naming all the contributors to this release. I think they deserve visibility in the changelog. Please tell me if we want to add this or maybe it's redundant given we link to the PRs?~~ changelog: none r? `@flip1995`
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
In developing the grammar a few weeks ago, I fixed up a bunch of test cases that had rotted to the point that they didn't parse.