Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Rollup of 12 pull requests #62882

Closed
wants to merge 46 commits into from
Closed

Conversation

Centril
Copy link
Contributor

@Centril Centril commented Jul 22, 2019

Successful merges:

Failed merges:

r? @ghost

SimonSapin and others added 30 commits July 9, 2019 11:45
Co-Authored-By: Mazdak Farrokhzad <twingoow@gmail.com>
Co-Authored-By: Mazdak Farrokhzad <twingoow@gmail.com>
Co-Authored-By: Mazdak Farrokhzad <twingoow@gmail.com>
I think this was left out by accident from the "convert everything to
rlibs" commit, there's no need for this to be a dylib just as everything
else doesn't need to be a dylib!
Move `source_uitil` macros into `syntax_ext`
Cleanup dependencies of `rustc_driver`
Few other minor renamings for consistency.
Remove one unused dependency from `rustc_passes`.
Fix libsyntax tests.
Fix rebase.
JohnTitor and others added 16 commits July 22, 2019 07:12
Use sharded maps for interning

Cuts down runtime from 5.5s to 3.8s for non-incremental `syntex_syntax` check builds with 16 threads / 8 cores.

r? @eddyb
…-62203-ice, r=varkor

Delay bug to resolve HRTB ICE

Fix rust-lang#62203
Add joining slices of slices with a slice separator, not just a single item

rust-lang#27747 (comment)
> It's kinda annoying to be able to join strings with a str (which can have multiple chars), but joining a slice of slices, you can only join with a single element.

This turns out to be fixable, with some possible inference regressions.

# TL;DR

Related trait(s) are unstable and tracked at rust-lang#27747, but the `[T]::join` method that is being extended here is already stable.

Example use of the new insta-stable functionality:

```rust
let nested: Vec<Vec<Foo>> = /* … */;
let separator: &[Foo] = /* … */;  // Previously: could only be a single &Foo
nested.join(separator)
```

Complete API affected by this PR, after changes:

```rust
impl<T> [T] {
    pub fn concat<Item: ?Sized>(&self) -> <Self as Concat<Item>>::Output
        where Self: Concat<Item>
    {
        Concat::concat(self)
    }
    pub fn join<Separator>(&self, sep: Separator) -> <Self as Join<Separator>>::Output
        where Self: Join<Separator>
    {
        Join::join(self, sep)
    }
}

// The `Item` parameter is only useful for the the slice-of-slices impl.
pub trait Concat<Item: ?Sized> {
    type Output;
    fn concat(slice: &Self) -> Self::Output;
}

pub trait Join<Separator> {
    type Output;
    fn join(slice: &Self, sep: Separator) -> Self::Output;
}

impl<T: Clone, V: Borrow<[T]>> Concat<T> for [V] {
    type Output = Vec<T>;
}

impl<T: Clone, V: Borrow<[T]>> Join<&'_ T> for [V] {
    type Output = Vec<T>;
}

// New functionality here!
impl<T: Clone, V: Borrow<[T]>> Join<&'_ [T]> for [V] {
    type Output = Vec<T>;
}

impl<S: Borrow<str>> Concat<str> for [S] {
    type Output = String;
}

impl<S: Borrow<str>> Join<&'_ str> for [S] {
    type Output = String;
}
```

# Details

After rust-lang#62403 but before this PR, the API is:

```rust
impl<T> [T] {
    pub fn concat<Separator: ?Sized>(&self) -> T::Output
        where T: SliceConcat<Separator>
    {
        SliceConcat::concat(self)
    }

    pub fn join<Separator: ?Sized>(&self, sep: &Separator) -> T::Output
        where T: SliceConcat<Separator>
    {
        SliceConcat::join(self, sep)
    }
}

pub trait SliceConcat<Separator: ?Sized>: Sized {
    type Output;
    fn concat(slice: &[Self]) -> Self::Output;
    fn join(slice: &[Self], sep: &Separator) -> Self::Output;
}

impl<T: Clone, V: Borrow<[T]>> SliceConcat<T> for V {
    type Output = Vec<T>;
}

impl<S: Borrow<str>> SliceConcat<str> for S {
    type Output = String;
}
```

By adding a trait impl we should be able to accept a slice of `T` as the separator, as an alternative to a single `T` value.

In a `some_slice.join(some_separator)` call, trait resolution will pick an impl or the other based on the type of `some_separator`. In `some_slice.concat()` however there is no separator, so this call would become ambiguous. Some regression in type inference or trait resolution may be acceptable on principle, but requiring a turbofish for every single call to `concat` isn’t great.

The solution to that is splitting the `SliceConcat` trait into two `Concat` and `Join` traits, one for each eponymous method. Only `Join` would gain a new impl, so that `some_slice.concat()` would not become ambiguous.

Now, at the trait level the `Concat` trait does not need a `Separator` parameter anymore. However, simply removing it causes one of the impls not to be accepted anymore:

```rust
error[E0207]: the type parameter `T` is not constrained by the impl trait, self type, or predicates
  --> src/liballoc/slice.rs:608:6
    |
608 | impl<T: Clone, V: Borrow<[T]>> Concat for [V] {
    |      ^ unconstrained type parameter
```

This makes sense: if `[V]::concat` is a method that is itself not generic, then its return type (which is the `Concat::Output` associated type) needs to be determined based on solely `V`. And although there is no such type in the standard library, there is nothing stopping another crate from defining a `V` type that implements both `Borrow<[Foo]>` and `Borrow<[Bar]>`. It might not be a good idea, but it’s possible. Both would apply here, and there would be no way to determine `T`.

This could be a warning sign that this API is too generic. Perhaps we’d be better off having one less type variable, and only implement `Concat for [&'_ [T]]` and `Concat for [Vec<T>]` etc. However this aspect of `[V]::concat` is already stable, so we’re stuck with it.

The solution is to keep a dummy type parameter on the `Concat` trait. That way, if a type has multiple `Borrow<[_]>` impls, it’ll end up with multiple corresponding `Concat<_>` impls.

In `impl<S: Borrow<str>> Concat<str> for [S]`, the second occurrence of `str` is not meaningful. It could be any type. As long as there is only once such type with an applicable impl, trait resolution will be appeased without demanding turbofishes.

# Joining strings with `char`

For symmetry I also tried adding this impl (because why not):

```rust
impl<S: Borrow<str>> Join<char> for [S] {
    type Output = String;
}
```

This immediately caused an inference regression in a dependency of rustc:

```rust
error[E0277]: the trait bound `std::string::String: std::borrow::Borrow<[std::string::String]>` is not satisfied
   --> /home/simon/.cargo/registry/src/git.luolix.top-1ecc6299db9ec823/getopts-0.2.19/src/lib.rs:595:37
    |
595 |             row.push_str(&desc_rows.join(&desc_sep));
    |                                     ^^^^ the trait `std::borrow::Borrow<[std::string::String]>` is not implemented for `std::string::String`
    |
    = help: the following implementations were found:
              <std::string::String as std::borrow::Borrow<str>>
    = note: required because of the requirements on the impl of `std::slice::Join<&std::string::String>` for `[std::string::String]`
```

In the context of this code, two facts are known:

* `desc_rows` is a `Vec<String>`
* `desc_sep` is a `String`

Previously the first fact alone reduces the resolution of `join` to only one solution, where its argument it expected to be `&str`. Then, `&String` is coerced to `&str`.

With the new `Join` impl, the first fact leavs two applicable impls where the separator can be either `&str` or `char`. But `&String` is neither of these things. It appears that possible coercions are not accounted for, in the search for a solution in trait resolution.

I have not included this new impl in this PR. It’s still possible to add later, but the `getopts` breakage does not need to block the rest of the PR. And the functionality easy for end-user to duplicate: `slice_of_strings.join(&*char_separator.encode_utf8(&mut [0_u8, 4]))`

The `&*` part of that last code snippet is another case of the same issue: `encode_utf8` returns `&mut str` which can be coerced to `&str`, but isn’t when trait resolution is ambiguous.
explain how to search in slice without owned data

Cc rust-lang#62367
Break dependencies between `syntax_ext` and other crates

Move `source_util` macros into `syntax_ext`.
Move other early code generation facilities like standard library injection into `syntax_ext`.

The only crate that depends on `syntax_ext` now is `rustc_interface` which is one of the "final" crates that depend on everything.

Minor: Cleanup dependencies of `rustc_driver`, many of them are no longer used after introduction of `rustc_interface`.

r? @eddyb
… r=eddyb

rustc_typeck: improve diagnostics for _ const/static declarations

This continues rust-lang#62694 and adds type suggestions to const/static declarations with `_` type.

r? @eddyb
Revert "Disable stack probing for gnux32."

This reverts commit 42d652e. (rust-lang#59686)

Closes rust-lang#59674.
…ulacrum

rustc: Compile the `fmt_macros` crate as an rlib

I think this was left out by accident from the "convert everything to
rlibs" commit, there's no need for this to be a dylib just as everything
else doesn't need to be a dylib!
Improve some pointer-related documentation
@Centril
Copy link
Contributor Author

Centril commented Jul 22, 2019

@bors r+ p=12 rollup=never

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Jul 22, 2019

📌 Commit 80aa34d has been approved by Centril

@bors bors added the S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. label Jul 22, 2019
@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Jul 23, 2019

⌛ Testing commit 80aa34d with merge 53df2ab7a53b3be48ad6a6a4c0d348f8aa9351cf...

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Jul 23, 2019

💔 Test failed - checks-azure

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. and removed S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. labels Jul 23, 2019
@Centril Centril closed this Jul 23, 2019
@Centril Centril deleted the rollup-3vor3sm branch July 23, 2019 19:36
@Centril Centril added the rollup A PR which is a rollup label Oct 24, 2019
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
rollup A PR which is a rollup S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.