-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 12.8k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
rustc_codegen_utils: account for 1-indexed anonymous lifetimes in v0 mangling. #63559
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
r? @estebank (rust_highfive has picked a reviewer for you, use r? to override) |
rust-highfive
added
the
S-waiting-on-review
Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties.
label
Aug 14, 2019
@bors r+ |
📌 Commit c1758d5 has been approved by |
bors
added
S-waiting-on-bors
Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion.
and removed
S-waiting-on-review
Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties.
labels
Aug 14, 2019
Centril
added a commit
to Centril/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Aug 15, 2019
rustc_codegen_utils: account for 1-indexed anonymous lifetimes in v0 mangling. I don't really understand why `anonymize_late_bound_regions` starts with `BrAnon(1)` instead of `BrAnon(0)`, but it does (maybe @nikomatsakis knows?): https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/blob/c43d03a19f326f4a323569328cc501e86eb6d22e/src/librustc/ty/fold.rs#L696-L712 Thankfully, the mangling format and demangler implementations are fine, and I just needed to offset the anonymized lifetime indices by `1` to get the correct mangling. cc @alexcrichton @michaelwoerister
Centril
added a commit
to Centril/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Aug 15, 2019
rustc_codegen_utils: account for 1-indexed anonymous lifetimes in v0 mangling. I don't really understand why `anonymize_late_bound_regions` starts with `BrAnon(1)` instead of `BrAnon(0)`, but it does (maybe @nikomatsakis knows?): https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/blob/c43d03a19f326f4a323569328cc501e86eb6d22e/src/librustc/ty/fold.rs#L696-L712 Thankfully, the mangling format and demangler implementations are fine, and I just needed to offset the anonymized lifetime indices by `1` to get the correct mangling. cc @alexcrichton @michaelwoerister
Centril
added a commit
to Centril/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Aug 15, 2019
rustc_codegen_utils: account for 1-indexed anonymous lifetimes in v0 mangling. I don't really understand why `anonymize_late_bound_regions` starts with `BrAnon(1)` instead of `BrAnon(0)`, but it does (maybe @nikomatsakis knows?): https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/blob/c43d03a19f326f4a323569328cc501e86eb6d22e/src/librustc/ty/fold.rs#L696-L712 Thankfully, the mangling format and demangler implementations are fine, and I just needed to offset the anonymized lifetime indices by `1` to get the correct mangling. cc @alexcrichton @michaelwoerister
@bors p=1 |
Centril
added a commit
to Centril/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Aug 17, 2019
rustc_codegen_utils: account for 1-indexed anonymous lifetimes in v0 mangling. I don't really understand why `anonymize_late_bound_regions` starts with `BrAnon(1)` instead of `BrAnon(0)`, but it does (maybe @nikomatsakis knows?): https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/blob/c43d03a19f326f4a323569328cc501e86eb6d22e/src/librustc/ty/fold.rs#L696-L712 Thankfully, the mangling format and demangler implementations are fine, and I just needed to offset the anonymized lifetime indices by `1` to get the correct mangling. cc @alexcrichton @michaelwoerister
Centril
added a commit
to Centril/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Aug 17, 2019
rustc_codegen_utils: account for 1-indexed anonymous lifetimes in v0 mangling. I don't really understand why `anonymize_late_bound_regions` starts with `BrAnon(1)` instead of `BrAnon(0)`, but it does (maybe @nikomatsakis knows?): https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/blob/c43d03a19f326f4a323569328cc501e86eb6d22e/src/librustc/ty/fold.rs#L696-L712 Thankfully, the mangling format and demangler implementations are fine, and I just needed to offset the anonymized lifetime indices by `1` to get the correct mangling. cc @alexcrichton @michaelwoerister
bors
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Aug 17, 2019
Rollup of 4 pull requests Successful merges: - #62737 (Override Cycle::try_fold) - #63505 (Hash the remapped sysroot instead of the original.) - #63559 (rustc_codegen_utils: account for 1-indexed anonymous lifetimes in v0 mangling.) - #63621 (Modify librustc_llvm to pass -DNDEBUG while compiling.) Failed merges: r? @ghost
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Labels
S-waiting-on-bors
Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
I don't really understand why
anonymize_late_bound_regions
starts withBrAnon(1)
instead ofBrAnon(0)
, but it does (maybe @nikomatsakis knows?):rust/src/librustc/ty/fold.rs
Lines 696 to 712 in c43d03a
Thankfully, the mangling format and demangler implementations are fine, and I just needed to offset the anonymized lifetime indices by
1
to get the correct mangling.cc @alexcrichton @michaelwoerister