Rollup of 5 pull requests #63671
Merged
Rollup of 5 pull requests #63671
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add APIs for uninitialized Box, Rc, and Arc. (Plus get_mut_unchecked) Assigning `MaybeUninit::<Foo>::uninit()` to a local variable is usually free, even when `size_of::<Foo>()` is large. However, passing it for example to `Arc::new` [causes at least one copy](https://youtu.be/F1AquroPfcI?t=4116) (from the stack to the newly allocated heap memory) even though there is no meaningful data. It is theoretically possible that a Sufficiently Advanced Compiler could optimize this copy away, but this is [reportedly unlikely to happen soon in LLVM](https://youtu.be/F1AquroPfcI?t=5431). This PR proposes two sets of features: * Constructors for containers (`Box`, `Rc`, `Arc`) of `MaybeUninit<T>` or `[MaybeUninit<T>]` that do not initialized the data, and unsafe conversions to the known-initialized types (without `MaybeUninit`). The constructors are guaranteed not to make unnecessary copies. * On `Rc` and `Arc`, an unsafe `get_mut_unchecked` method that provides `&mut T` access without checking the reference count. `Arc::get_mut` involves multiple atomic operations whose cost can be non-trivial. `Rc::get_mut` is less costly, but we add `Rc::get_mut_unchecked` anyway for symmetry with `Arc`. These can be useful independently, but they will presumably be typical when the new constructors of `Rc` and `Arc` are used. An alternative with a safe API would be to introduce `UniqueRc` and `UniqueArc` types that have the same memory layout as `Rc` and `Arc` (and so zero-cost conversion to them) but are guaranteed to have only one reference. But introducing entire new types feels “heavier” than new constructors on existing types, and initialization of `MaybeUninit<T>` typically requires unsafe code anyway. Summary of new APIs (all unstable in this PR): ```rust impl<T> Box<T> { pub fn new_uninit() -> Box<MaybeUninit<T>> {…} } impl<T> Box<MaybeUninit<T>> { pub unsafe fn assume_init(self) -> Box<T> {…} } impl<T> Box<[T]> { pub fn new_uninit_slice(len: usize) -> Box<[MaybeUninit<T>]> {…} } impl<T> Box<[MaybeUninit<T>]> { pub unsafe fn assume_init(self) -> Box<[T]> {…} } impl<T> Rc<T> { pub fn new_uninit() -> Rc<MaybeUninit<T>> {…} } impl<T> Rc<MaybeUninit<T>> { pub unsafe fn assume_init(self) -> Rc<T> {…} } impl<T> Rc<[T]> { pub fn new_uninit_slice(len: usize) -> Rc<[MaybeUninit<T>]> {…} } impl<T> Rc<[MaybeUninit<T>]> { pub unsafe fn assume_init(self) -> Rc<[T]> {…} } impl<T> Arc<T> { pub fn new_uninit() -> Arc<MaybeUninit<T>> {…} } impl<T> Arc<MaybeUninit<T>> { pub unsafe fn assume_init(self) -> Arc<T> {…} } impl<T> Arc<[T]> { pub fn new_uninit_slice(len: usize) -> Arc<[MaybeUninit<T>]> {…} } impl<T> Arc<[MaybeUninit<T>]> { pub unsafe fn assume_init(self) -> Arc<[T]> {…} } impl<T: ?Sized> Rc<T> { pub unsafe fn get_mut_unchecked(this: &mut Self) -> &mut T {…} } impl<T: ?Sized> Arc<T> { pub unsafe fn get_mut_unchecked(this: &mut Self) -> &mut T {…} } ```
…s-in-src/test-2, r=Centril Remove meaningless comments in src/test Moved from rust-lang#63411
Crank up invalid value lint * Warn against uninit `bool` and `char`. * Warn against 0-init `NonNull` and friends * Detect transmute-from-0 as zero-initialization ([seen in the wild](glium/glium#1775 (comment)))
…ewjasper resolve: Properly integrate derives and `macro_rules` scopes So, ```rust #[derive(A, B)] struct S; m!(); ``` turns into something like ```rust struct S; A_placeholder!( struct S; ); B_placeholder!( struct S; ); m!(); ``` during expansion. And for `m!()` its "`macro_rules` scope" (aka "legacy scope") should point to the `B_placeholder` call rather than to the derive container `#[derive(A, B)]`. `fn build_reduced_graph` now makes sure the legacy scope points to the right thing. (It's still a mystery for me why this worked before rust-lang#63535.) Unfortunately, placeholders from derives are currently treated separately from placeholders from other macros and need to be passed as `extra_placeholders` rather than a part of the AST fragment. That's fixable, but I wanted to keep this PR more minimal to close the regression faster. Fixes rust-lang#63651 r? @matthewjasper
…vink fix typos in mir/interpret
|
@bors r+ p=5 rollup=never |
|
📌 Commit 4ec9703 has been approved by |
bors
added
the
S-waiting-on-bors
bors
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Aug 17, 2019
Rollup of 5 pull requests Successful merges: - #62451 (Add APIs for uninitialized Box, Rc, and Arc. (Plus get_mut_unchecked)) - #63487 (Remove meaningless comments in src/test) - #63657 (Crank up invalid value lint) - #63667 (resolve: Properly integrate derives and `macro_rules` scopes) - #63669 (fix typos in mir/interpret) Failed merges: r? @ghost
|
☀️ Test successful - checks-azure |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Successful merges:
macro_rulesscopes #63667 (resolve: Properly integrate derives andmacro_rulesscopes)Failed merges:
r? @ghost