-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 13.1k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Rollup of 5 pull requests #64816
Merged
Merged
Rollup of 5 pull requests #64816
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This can be kept within the codegen backend crates entirely
Fuchsia exit codes don't follow the convention of libc::WEXITSTATUS et al, and they are 64 bits instead of 32 bits. This gives Fuchsia its own representation of ExitStatus. Additionally, the zircon syscall structs were out of date, causing us to see bogus return codes.
Based on issue rust-lang#64732, when creating a byte literal with single quotes, the suggestion message would indicate that you meant to write a `str` literal, but we actually meant to write a byte string literal. So I changed the unescape_error_reporting.rs to decide whether to print out "if you meant to write a `str` literal, use double quotes", or "if you meant to write a byte string literal, use double quotes".
…hewjasper Rust 2015: No longer downgrade NLL errors As per decision on a language team meeting as described in rust-lang#63565 (comment), in Rust 2015, we refuse to downgrade NLL errors, that AST borrowck accepts, into warnings and keep them as hard errors. The remaining work to throw out AST borrowck and adjust some tests still remains after this PR. Fixes rust-lang#38899 Fixes rust-lang#53432 Fixes rust-lang#45157 Fixes rust-lang#31567 Fixes rust-lang#27868 Fixes rust-lang#47366 r? @matthewjasper
Remove tx_to_llvm_workers from TyCtxt This can be kept within the codegen backend crates entirely -- there's no reason for us to create it outside and attempt to hold it in the (global) context. Changes here aren't really too easily reviewable I suspect -- not sure if they can be cleaned up by splitting into more commits though, it's just hard to reason about `Box<Any>` in general. If there are thoughts though I'd be happy to hear them. The primary goal of this PR is to get rid of the field on `rustc_interface::Queries`.
Fix issue rust-lang#64732 Based on issue rust-lang#64732, when creating a byte literal with single quotes, the suggestion message would indicate that you meant to write a `str` literal, but we actually meant to write a byte string literal. So I changed the unescape_error_reporting.rs to decide whether to print out "if you meant to write a `str` literal, use double quotes", or "if you meant to write a byte string literal, use double quotes". Fixes rust-lang#64732.
Fix ExitStatus on Fuchsia Fuchsia exit codes don't follow the convention of libc::WEXITSTATUS et al, and they are 64 bits instead of 32 bits. This gives Fuchsia its own representation of ExitStatus. Additionally, the zircon syscall structs were out of date, causing us to see bogus exit codes. r? @cramertj @alexcrichton
…r=Centril Add test for E0543
@bors r+ p=5 rollup=never |
📌 Commit 02a8505 has been approved by |
bors
added
the
S-waiting-on-bors
Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion.
label
Sep 26, 2019
💥 Test timed out |
bors
removed
the
S-waiting-on-bors
Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion.
label
Sep 26, 2019
bors
added
the
S-waiting-on-review
Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties.
label
Sep 26, 2019
@bors retry |
bors
added
S-waiting-on-bors
Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion.
and removed
S-waiting-on-review
Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties.
labels
Sep 26, 2019
☀️ Test successful - checks-azure |
This was referenced Sep 27, 2019
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Labels
merged-by-bors
This PR was explicitly merged by bors.
rollup
A PR which is a rollup
S-waiting-on-bors
Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Successful merges:
Failed merges:
r? @ghost