InterpCx: make memory field public #65319
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
rust-highfive
added
the
S-waiting-on-review
|
If you want to you can r=me on the diff itself but be warned: I don't have the larger context to know whether this is the right / wrong direction :) |
|
Fair. ;) @bors r=Centril |
|
📌 Commit 715ffab has been approved by |
bors
added
S-waiting-on-bors
|
@bors rollup |
Centril
added a commit
to Centril/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Oct 16, 2019
InterpCx: make memory field public I made this field private forever ago because I thought sealing things might be nice. But with the `memory_mut` getter it doesn't actually seal anything, and it's not like we need to invalidate caches on writes to memory or so. And moreover, having to use the getters leads to some annoying borrow checking interactions. So, let's just make it public (again). r? @oli-obk
Centril
added a commit
to Centril/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Oct 16, 2019
InterpCx: make memory field public I made this field private forever ago because I thought sealing things might be nice. But with the `memory_mut` getter it doesn't actually seal anything, and it's not like we need to invalidate caches on writes to memory or so. And moreover, having to use the getters leads to some annoying borrow checking interactions. So, let's just make it public (again). r? @oli-obk
bors
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Oct 17, 2019
Rollup of 8 pull requests Successful merges: - #65094 (Prefer statx on linux if available) - #65316 (make File::try_clone produce non-inheritable handles on Windows) - #65319 (InterpCx: make memory field public) - #65461 (Don't recommend ONCE_INIT in std::sync::Once) - #65465 (Move syntax::ext to a syntax_expand and refactor some attribute logic) - #65469 (Update libc to 0.2.64) - #65475 (add example for type_name) - #65478 (fmt::Write is about string slices, not byte slices) Failed merges: r? @ghost
Centril
added a commit
to Centril/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Oct 17, 2019
InterpCx: make memory field public I made this field private forever ago because I thought sealing things might be nice. But with the `memory_mut` getter it doesn't actually seal anything, and it's not like we need to invalidate caches on writes to memory or so. And moreover, having to use the getters leads to some annoying borrow checking interactions. So, let's just make it public (again). r? @oli-obk
bors
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Oct 17, 2019
Rollup of 8 pull requests Successful merges: - #65237 (Move debug_map assertions after check for err) - #65316 (make File::try_clone produce non-inheritable handles on Windows) - #65319 (InterpCx: make memory field public) - #65461 (Don't recommend ONCE_INIT in std::sync::Once) - #65465 (Move syntax::ext to a syntax_expand and refactor some attribute logic) - #65475 (add example for type_name) - #65478 (fmt::Write is about string slices, not byte slices) - #65486 (doc: fix typo in OsStrExt and OsStringExt) Failed merges: r? @ghost
bors
added a commit
to rust-lang/miri
that referenced
this pull request
Oct 18, 2019
Use memory field instead of memory() Rustup for rust-lang/rust#65319
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
I made this field private forever ago because I thought sealing things might be nice. But with the
memory_mutgetter it doesn't actually seal anything, and it's not like we need to invalidate caches on writes to memory or so. And moreover, having to use the getters leads to some annoying borrow checking interactions.So, let's just make it public (again).
r? @oli-obk