Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

rustdoc: Mark --extern-private as unstable #66655

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Nov 24, 2019

Conversation

ollie27
Copy link
Member

@ollie27 ollie27 commented Nov 23, 2019

It's not even stable in rustc so it shouldn't be stable in rustdoc.

r? @kinnison

It's not even stable in rustc so it shouldn't be stable in rustdoc.
@GuillaumeGomez
Copy link
Member

Thanks!

@bors: r+

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Nov 23, 2019

📌 Commit 4fcb338 has been approved by GuillaumeGomez

@bors bors added the S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. label Nov 23, 2019
Centril added a commit to Centril/rust that referenced this pull request Nov 23, 2019
…able, r=GuillaumeGomez

rustdoc: Mark `--extern-private` as unstable

It's not even stable in rustc so it shouldn't be stable in rustdoc.

r? @kinnison
bors added a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 23, 2019
Rollup of 5 pull requests

Successful merges:

 - #61351 (Stabilize cfg(doc))
 - #66539 (Point at type in `let` assignment on type errors)
 - #66655 (rustdoc: Mark `--extern-private` as unstable)
 - #66657 (rustdoc: Don't panic when failing to write .lock file)
 - #66673 (Move def collector from `rustc` to `rustc_resolve`)

Failed merges:

r? @ghost
@bors bors merged commit 4fcb338 into rust-lang:master Nov 24, 2019
@ollie27 ollie27 deleted the rustdoc_extern-private_unstable branch November 24, 2019 13:23
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants