Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Rebase LLVM onto 9.0.1 #68030

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jan 19, 2020
Merged

Rebase LLVM onto 9.0.1 #68030

merged 1 commit into from
Jan 19, 2020

Conversation

cuviper
Copy link
Member

@cuviper cuviper commented Jan 8, 2020

While work on LLVM 10 is in progress in #67759, in the meantime we can do a smaller rebase to pick up fixes in 9.0.1, released December 19, 2019.

r? @nikic

@rust-highfive
Copy link
Collaborator

⚠️ Warning ⚠️

  • These commits modify submodules.

@rust-highfive rust-highfive added the S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. label Jan 8, 2020
@nikic
Copy link
Contributor

nikic commented Jan 8, 2020

@bors r+

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Jan 8, 2020

📌 Commit 0d2f982 has been approved by nikic

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Jan 8, 2020
@Centril
Copy link
Contributor

Centril commented Jan 8, 2020

@bors rollup=never

@nikic nikic mentioned this pull request Jan 17, 2020
@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Jan 18, 2020

⌛ Testing commit 0d2f982 with merge 50cb3fe6e0638ccbd7737e130d08f1391bff46e2...

@rust-highfive
Copy link
Collaborator

Your PR failed (pretty log, raw log). Through arcane magic we have determined that the following fragments from the build log may contain information about the problem.

Click to expand the log.

I'm a bot! I can only do what humans tell me to, so if this was not helpful or you have suggestions for improvements, please ping or otherwise contact @TimNN. (Feature Requests)

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Jan 18, 2020

💔 Test failed - checks-azure

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. and removed S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. labels Jan 18, 2020
@cuviper
Copy link
Member Author

cuviper commented Jan 18, 2020

3 of the Windows builders got an error in the "install clang" step, curl: (56) OpenSSL SSL_read: Connection was reset, but the rest of the Windows builders got past that, so let's call it spurious.

@bors retry

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Jan 18, 2020
@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Jan 19, 2020

⌛ Testing commit 0d2f982 with merge bb410ad...

bors added a commit that referenced this pull request Jan 19, 2020
Rebase LLVM onto 9.0.1

While work on LLVM 10 is in progress in #67759, in the meantime we can do a smaller rebase to pick up fixes in 9.0.1, released December 19, 2019.

r? @nikic
@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Jan 19, 2020

☀️ Test successful - checks-azure
Approved by: nikic
Pushing bb410ad to master...

@bors bors added the merged-by-bors This PR was explicitly merged by bors. label Jan 19, 2020
@bors bors merged commit 0d2f982 into rust-lang:master Jan 19, 2020
@bors bors mentioned this pull request Jan 19, 2020
8 tasks
@cuviper cuviper deleted the llvm-9.0.1 branch April 3, 2020 18:38
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
merged-by-bors This PR was explicitly merged by bors. S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants