Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Don't run coherence twice for future-compat lints #69044

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Feb 11, 2020
+43 −30
Merged

Don't run coherence twice for future-compat lints #69044

Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
1 commit
Select commit
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
73 changes: 43 additions & 30 deletions src/librustc/traits/specialize/specialization_graph.rs
View file
Open in desktop
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -86,10 +86,10 @@ impl<'tcx> Children {
impl_def_id, simplified_self, possible_sibling,
);

let overlap_error = |overlap: traits::coherence::OverlapResult<'_>| {
// Found overlap, but no specialization; error out.
let create_overlap_error = |overlap: traits::coherence::OverlapResult<'_>| {
let trait_ref = overlap.impl_header.trait_ref.unwrap();
let self_ty = trait_ref.self_ty();

OverlapError {
with_impl: possible_sibling,
trait_desc: trait_ref.print_only_trait_path().to_string(),
Expand All @@ -106,21 +106,49 @@ impl<'tcx> Children {
}
};

let allowed_to_overlap =
tcx.impls_are_allowed_to_overlap(impl_def_id, possible_sibling);
let report_overlap_error = |overlap: traits::coherence::OverlapResult<'_>,
last_lint: &mut _| {
// Found overlap, but no specialization; error out or report future-compat warning.

// Do we *still* get overlap if we disable the future-incompatible modes?
let should_err = traits::overlapping_impls(
tcx,
possible_sibling,
impl_def_id,
traits::SkipLeakCheck::default(),
|_| true,
|| false,
);

let error = create_overlap_error(overlap);

if should_err {
Err(error)
} else {
*last_lint = Some(FutureCompatOverlapError {
error,
kind: FutureCompatOverlapErrorKind::LeakCheck,
});

Ok((false, false))
}
};

let last_lint_mut = &mut last_lint;
let (le, ge) = traits::overlapping_impls(
tcx,
possible_sibling,
impl_def_id,
traits::SkipLeakCheck::default(),
traits::SkipLeakCheck::Yes,
|overlap| {
if let Some(overlap_kind) = &allowed_to_overlap {
if let Some(overlap_kind) =
tcx.impls_are_allowed_to_overlap(impl_def_id, possible_sibling)
{
match overlap_kind {
ty::ImplOverlapKind::Permitted { marker: _ } => {}
ty::ImplOverlapKind::Issue33140 => {
last_lint = Some(FutureCompatOverlapError {
error: overlap_error(overlap),
*last_lint_mut = Some(FutureCompatOverlapError {
error: create_overlap_error(overlap),
kind: FutureCompatOverlapErrorKind::Issue33140,
});
}
Expand All @@ -132,7 +160,11 @@ impl<'tcx> Children {
let le = tcx.specializes((impl_def_id, possible_sibling));
let ge = tcx.specializes((possible_sibling, impl_def_id));

if le == ge { Err(overlap_error(overlap)) } else { Ok((le, ge)) }
if le == ge {
report_overlap_error(overlap, last_lint_mut)
} else {
Ok((le, ge))
}
},
|| Ok((false, false)),
)?;
Expand All @@ -153,27 +185,8 @@ impl<'tcx> Children {

replace_children.push(possible_sibling);
} else {
if let None = allowed_to_overlap {
// Do future-compat checks for overlap.

if last_lint.is_none() {
traits::overlapping_impls(
tcx,
possible_sibling,
impl_def_id,
traits::SkipLeakCheck::Yes,
|overlap| {
last_lint = Some(FutureCompatOverlapError {
error: overlap_error(overlap),
kind: FutureCompatOverlapErrorKind::LeakCheck,
});
},
|| (),
);
}
}

// no overlap (error bailed already via ?)
// Either there's no overlap, or the overlap was already reported by
// `overlap_error`.
}
}

Expand Down