-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 12.7k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Hygiene fns and cleanup #6938
Merged
Merged
Hygiene fns and cleanup #6938
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
bors
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jun 5, 2013
…ements I'm close to flipping the switch on hygiene for let-bound identifiers. This commit adds a bunch of support functions for that change... but also a huge amount of cleanup in syntax.rc. The most interesting of these are - the use of TLS for the interners everywhere. We had already breached the "no-global-state" dam by using TLS for encoding, and it saves a lot of code just to use it everywhere. Also, there were many places where two or more interners were passed in attached to different structures, and the danger of having those diverge seemed greater that the danger of having a single one get big and heavy. If the interner size proves to be a problem, it should be quite simple to add a "parameterize"-like dynamic binding form--because we don't have interesting continuation operations (or tail calling, mostly) this should just be a case of a mutation followed by another later mutation. Again, this is only if the interner gets too big. - I renamed the "repr" field of the identifier to "name". I can see the case for "repr" when there's only one field in the structure, but that's no longer the case; there's now a name and a context (both are uints). - the interner now just maps between strings and uints, rather than between idents and uints. The former state made perfect sense when identifiers didn't have syntax contexts, but that's no longer the case. I've run this patch against a fairly recent incoming, and it appears to pass all tests. Let's see if it can be merged....
flip1995
pushed a commit
to flip1995/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Apr 8, 2021
Refactor types r? `@flip1995` This is the last PR to close rust-lang#6724 🎉 Also, this fixes rust-lang#6936. changelog: `vec_box`: Fix FN in `const` or `static` changelog: `linkedlist`: Fix FN in `const` or `static` changelog: `option_option`: Fix FN in `const` or `static`
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
I'm close to flipping the switch on hygiene for let-bound identifiers. This commit adds a bunch of support functions for that change... but also a huge amount of cleanup in syntax.rc. The most interesting of these are
Also, there were many places where two or more interners were passed in attached to different structures, and the danger of having those diverge seemed greater that the danger of having a single one get big and heavy. If the interner size proves to be a problem, it should be quite simple to add a "parameterize"-like dynamic binding form--because we don't have interesting continuation operations (or tail calling, mostly) this should just be a case of a mutation followed by another later mutation. Again, this is only if the interner gets too big.
I've run this patch against a fairly recent incoming, and it appears to pass all tests. Let's see if it can be merged....