-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 12.7k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
cargotest: remove webrender #70626
cargotest: remove webrender #70626
Conversation
The current webrender commit occasionally fails without a reason, and the latest webrender commit is missing a dependency on our Windows builders. It's not worth installing an extra dependency for cargotest, and the spurious failure makes keeping this test not worth it.
Updates src/tools/cargo. cc @ehuss |
IMO, r=me, but I thought we were still discussing this in infra? Not sure what we settled on. If that discussion agrees with merging this then I'm happy to merge. (Or if we have no conclusion, then I also think we should merge to fix the spurious failure). |
@bors r=Mark-Simulacrum Regarding the discussion, we haven't settled on a list of crates yet, so let's merge this to fix the spurious failure. |
📌 Commit 0110634 has been approved by |
🌲 The tree is currently closed for pull requests below priority 500, this pull request will be tested once the tree is reopened |
Rollup of 6 pull requests Successful merges: - rust-lang#70535 (Track the finalizing node in the specialization graph) - rust-lang#70590 (Miri: make backtrace function names and spans match up) - rust-lang#70616 (rustc_target::abi: rename FieldPlacement to FieldsShape.) - rust-lang#70626 (cargotest: remove webrender) - rust-lang#70649 (clean up E0468 explanation) - rust-lang#70662 (compiletest: don't use `std::io::stdout()`, as it bypasses `set_print`.) Failed merges: r? @ghost
The current webrender commit occasionally fails without a reason, and the latest webrender commit is missing a dependency on our Windows builders. It's not worth installing an extra dependency for cargotest, and the spurious failure makes keeping this test not worth it.
r? @Mark-Simulacrum