-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 12.8k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Rollup of 4 pull requests #71876
Closed
Closed
Rollup of 4 pull requests #71876
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
- Documented rationale of current solution - Polished documentation
When panic != unwind, `nounwind` is added to all functions for a target. This can cause issues when a panic happens with RUST_BACKTRACE=1, as there needs to be a way to reconstruct the backtrace. There are three possible sources of this information: forcing frame pointers (for which an option exists already), debug info (for which an option exists), or unwind tables. Especially for embedded devices, forcing frame pointers can have code size overheads (RISC-V sees ~10% overheads, ARM sees ~2-3% overheads). In code, it can be the case that debug info is not kept, so it is useful to provide this third option, unwind tables, that users can use to reconstruct the call stack. Reconstructing this stack is harder than with frame pointers, but it is still possible. This commit adds a compiler option which allows a user to force the addition of unwind tables. Unwind tables cannot be disabled on targets that require them for correctness, or when using `-C panic=unwind`.
…na-kruppe Add Option to Force Unwind Tables When panic != unwind, `nounwind` is added to all functions for a target. This can cause issues when a panic happens with RUST_BACKTRACE=1, as there needs to be a way to reconstruct the backtrace. There are three possible sources of this information: forcing frame pointers (for which an option exists already), debug info (for which an option exists), or unwind tables. Especially for embedded devices, forcing frame pointers can have code size overheads (RISC-V sees ~10% overheads, ARM sees ~2-3% overheads). In production code, it can be the case that debug info is not kept, so it is useful to provide this third option, unwind tables, that users can use to reconstruct the call stack. Reconstructing this stack is harder than with frame pointers, but it is still possible. --- This came up in discussion on rust-lang#69890, and turned out to be a fairly simple addition. r? @hanna-kruppe
…wesleywiser Added MIR constant propagation of Scalars into function call arguments Now for the function call arguments! Caveats: 1. It's only being enabled at `mir-opt-2` or higher, because currently codegen gives performance regressions with this optimization. 2. Only propagates Scalars. Tuples and references (references are `Indirect`, right??) are not being propagated into as of this PR. 3. Maybe more tests would be nice? 4. I need (shamefully) to ask @wesleywiser to write in his words (or explain to me, and then I can write it down) why we want to ignore propagation into `ScalarPairs` and `Indirect` arguments. r? @wesleywiser
doc: misc rustdoc things
Do not try to find binop method on RHS `TyErr` Fix rust-lang#71798.
@bors r+ rollup=never p=4 |
📌 Commit cbae34c has been approved by |
bors
added
the
S-waiting-on-bors
Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion.
label
May 4, 2020
⌛ Testing commit cbae34c with merge 1b61dd7a782bf38ab2aaddb6100e7b4d2319c940... |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Labels
S-waiting-on-bors
Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Successful merges:
TyErr
#71810 (Do not try to find binop method on RHSTyErr
)Failed merges:
r? @ghost