-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 12.8k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
RISC-V GNU/Linux as host platform #72973
Conversation
@rustbot modify labels: +O-riscv +O-linux +T-infra |
Looks good to me, thanks! |
Code-wise this looks ok, but I'll leave it up to @pietroalbini for the final approval to confirm the infra team has capacity for this. |
This adds RISC-V as a Tier 2 platform, has the compiler team approved the change? |
It is already a tier 2 platform. |
Well, it's a tier 2 cross-compilation platform, but this PR moves it to a tier 2 host platform, which increases the amount of things we test on CI. @nikomatsakis does the compiler team want to weight on moving RISC-V Linux to a tier 2 host platform (it's just a tier 2 cross-compilation platform now)? |
For reference, |
I'm comfortable with adding new tier platforms if the infra support is there and if we setup a group of folks to notify for help when problems arise. I've been a bit slow in doing the work to create that group for windows, but I think we could readily create a group for RISC-V at the same time. |
(I didn't mean that to be the "opinion of the @rust-lang/compiler team", though. We don't really have a clear set of rules for what it takes to move something from Tier to Tier. I have to review what we said in our design meeting to remember how we felt about this.) |
So you may have seen the recent announcement of our Windows and ARM notification groups -- I'd like to setup something similar for RISC-V, but otherwise I am happy to accept the group as Tier 2. I don't think we've quite worked out what are the requirements to "move forward" around Tiers and the like. The draft RFC states that "Any new tier 2 target requires compiler team approval based on these requirements", but it's not very clear on what "compiler team approval" means. I think something like an MCP would be a reasonable way to advertise this change. I would happily second such a proposal, presuming that Infra gives the ok and that we can find >=2 volunteers to be on the "notification list" for RISC-V. |
By the way, we need to discuss a bit inside the infrastructure team on whether we have the capacity to add extra builders or not. |
@msizanoen1 Is there a beta way to boot riscv host rust? I tried on your branch for native compiling in qemu but in some ways still failed |
In today's infrastructure team meeting we approved allocating one builder for riscv64-unknown-linux-gnu. I'll defer to the compiler team for a final approval of the uplift to Host Tier 2. |
@pietroalbini rust-lang/compiler-team#312 has been approved, so compiler team signs off on this |
Thanks! @bors r+ rollup=iffy |
📌 Commit 933ba82 has been approved by |
…arth Rollup of 14 pull requests Successful merges: - rust-lang#72973 (RISC-V GNU/Linux as host platform) - rust-lang#73918 (Clean up E0715 explanation) - rust-lang#73959 (Clean up E0716 explanation) - rust-lang#74119 (Remove `Compiler::compile()`.) - rust-lang#74196 (Add option to collapse automatically implementors) - rust-lang#74218 (Add margin after doc search results) - rust-lang#74276 (improve DiscriminantKind handling) - rust-lang#74291 (Added docs for `From<c_int>` for `ExitStatus`) - rust-lang#74294 (Update cross-compilation README) - rust-lang#74337 (Handle case of incomplete local ty more gracefully) - rust-lang#74344 (Remove string comparison and use diagnostic item instead) - rust-lang#74347 (Initialize default providers only once) - rust-lang#74353 (Edit docs for rustc_middle::dep_graph::dep_node) - rust-lang#74374 (Add a 1.45 release note on lto vs. embed-bitcode) Failed merges: - rust-lang#74251 (Teach bootstrap about target files vs target triples) r? @ghost
… r=pietroalbini Add RISC-V GNU/Linux to src/tools/build-manifest as a host platform Missed during rust-lang#72973
… r=pietroalbini Add RISC-V GNU/Linux to src/tools/build-manifest as a host platform Missed during rust-lang#72973
… r=pietroalbini Add RISC-V GNU/Linux to src/tools/build-manifest as a host platform Missed during rust-lang#72973
… r=pietroalbini Add RISC-V GNU/Linux to src/tools/build-manifest as a host platform Missed during rust-lang#72973
… r=pietroalbini Add RISC-V GNU/Linux to src/tools/build-manifest as a host platform Missed during rust-lang#72973
… r=pietroalbini Add RISC-V GNU/Linux to src/tools/build-manifest as a host platform Missed during rust-lang#72973
… r=pietroalbini Add RISC-V GNU/Linux to src/tools/build-manifest as a host platform Missed during rust-lang#72973
This PR add a new builder named
dist-riscv64-linux
that builds the compiler toolchain for RISC-V 64-bit GNU/Linux.r? @alexcrichton