-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 12.9k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Remove noisy suggestion of hash_map #73023
Remove noisy suggestion of hash_map #73023
Conversation
(rust_highfive has picked a reviewer for you, use r? to override) |
r? @davidtwco Sorry to bother you again. Can you please review and approve this PR? |
@Dylan-DPC @lzutao @lcnr I have raised new PR and closed #72947. Please take a look. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thanks 👍
Please add fixes #72642
to the description of this PR.
This automatically closes that issue once this PR is merged.
edit: what was the reason for closing the original PR?
Will r+ once CI passes! |
@lcnr I did something wrong while squashing the commit. That's why I raised fresh PR. |
@bors r+ |
📌 Commit 9d1a883 has been approved by |
…tion, r=davidtwco Remove noisy suggestion of hash_map Remove noisy suggestion of hash_map rust-lang#72642 fixes rust-lang#72642
…tion, r=davidtwco Remove noisy suggestion of hash_map Remove noisy suggestion of hash_map rust-lang#72642 fixes rust-lang#72642
7edbb63
to
b786296
Compare
@Dylan-DPC Please let me know if anything is pending from my side. I rebased my PR with the master branch. CI pipeline is working fine. |
@bors r+ |
📌 Commit b7862969bf3671b767693d8f31d58424c6592d91 has been approved by |
Fixed failing test-cases Remove noisy suggestion of hash_map rust-lang#72642 Fixed failing test-cases
b786296
to
b055552
Compare
@Dylan-DPC Please let me know if there is anything stopping this PR to be merged in master. This PR has been approved by the reviewer @davidtwco . I have been rebasing with master on daily basis and CI pipeline is also green. Please let me know if there is anything pending from my side. I would address it asap. |
@ayushmishra2005 Unless there are conflicts or CI failures while merging, you don’t need to rebase - every time you do, I need to reapprove. It’s in the merge queue. @bors r+ |
📌 Commit b055552 has been approved by |
Rollup of 9 pull requests Successful merges: - rust-lang#72706 (Add windows group to triagebot) - rust-lang#72789 (resolve: Do not suggest imports from the same module in which we are resolving) - rust-lang#72890 (improper ctypes: normalize return types and transparent structs) - rust-lang#72897 (normalize adt fields during structural match checking) - rust-lang#73005 (Don't create impl candidates when obligation contains errors) - rust-lang#73023 (Remove noisy suggestion of hash_map ) - rust-lang#73070 (Add regression test for const generic ICE in rust-lang#72819) - rust-lang#73157 (Don't lose empty `where` clause when pretty-printing) - rust-lang#73184 (Reoder order in which MinGW libs are linked to fix recent breakage) Failed merges: r? @ghost
Remove noisy suggestion of hash_map #72642
fixes #72642