-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 12.8k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Rollup of 7 pull requests #73053
Closed
Closed
Rollup of 7 pull requests #73053
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
LLVM 10 includes a009a60 which will print value numbers for unnamed func args. Update these tests to be in line with the referenced clang tests.
It isn't clear to me if this is a bug or not, hence the FIXME
de-promote Duration::from_secs In rust-lang#67531, we removed the `rustc_promotable` attribute from a bunch of `Duration` methods, but not from `Duration::from_secs`. This makes the current list of promotable functions the following (courtesy of @ecstatic-morse): * `INT::min_value`, `INT::max_value` * `std::mem::size_of`, `std::mem::align_of` * `RangeInclusive::new` (backing `x..=y`) * `std::ptr::null`, `std::ptr::null_mut` * `RawWaker::new`, `RawWakerVTable::new` ??? * `Duration::from_secs` I feel like the last one stands out a bit here -- the rest are all very core language primitives, and `RawWaker` has a strong motivation for getting a `'static` vtable. But a `&'static Duration`? That seems unlikely. So I propose we no longer promote calls to `Duration::from_secs`, which is what this PR does. rust-lang#67531 saw zero regressions and I am not aware of anyone complaining that this broke their (non-cratered) code, so I consider it likely the same will be true here, but of course we'd do a crater run. See [this document](https://github.com/rust-lang/const-eval/blob/master/promotion.md) for some more background on promotion and rust-lang/const-eval#19 for some of the concerns around promoting function calls.
linker: Add a linker rerun hack for gcc versions not supporting -static-pie Which mirrors the existing `-no-pie` linker rerun hack, but the logic is a bit more elaborated in this case. If the linker (gcc or clang) errors on `-static-pie` we rerun in with `-static` instead. We must also replace CRT objects corresponding to `-static-pie` with ones corresponding to `-static` in this case. (One sanity check for CRT objects in target specs is also added as a drive-by fix.) To do in the future: refactor all linker rerun hacks into separate functions and share more code with `add_(pre,post)_link_objects`. This PR accompanies rust-lang#71804 and unblocks rust-lang#70740.
…stebank Be more careful around ty::Error in generators cc rust-lang#72685 (doesn't close it because it's missing a reproduction to use as a test case) r? @estebank
…70924, r=nikomatsakis run-make regression test for issue rust-lang#70924. Sometime after my PR rust-lang#72767 (to fix issue rust-lang#70924) landed, I realized that I *could* make a local regression test, thanks to `rustc --print sysroot`: I can make a fresh "copy" (really mostly symlinks) of the sysroot, and then modify it to recreate the terms of this bug.
…atsakis Fix codegen tests for RISC-V Some codegen tests didn't seem relevant (e.g. unsupported annotations). The RISC-V abi tests were broken by LLVM 10, c872dcf fixes that (cc: @msizanoen1) I'm not sure about skipping catch-unwind.rs and included that change here mostly as a request for comment - I can't tell if that's a bug.
…u16, r=sfackler impl ToSocketAddrs for (String, u16) This adds a convenience impl of `ToSocketAddrs for (String, u16)`. When authoring HTTP services it's common to take command line options for `host` and `port` and parse them into `String` and `u16` respectively. Consider the following program: ```rust #[derive(Debug, StructOpt)] struct Config { host: String, port: u16, } async fn main() -> io::Result<()> { let config = Config::from_args(); let stream = TcpStream::connect((&*config.host, config.port))?; // &* is not ideal // ... } ``` Networking is a pretty common starting point for people new to Rust, and seeing `&*` in basic examples can be confusing. Even as someone that has experience with networking in Rust I tend to forget that `String` can't be passed directly there. Instead with this patch we can omit the `&*` conversion and pass `host` directly: ```rust #[derive(Debug, StructOpt)] struct Config { host: String, port: u16, } async fn main() -> io::Result<()> { let config = Config::from_args(); let stream = TcpStream::connect((config.host, config.port))?; // no more conversions! // ... } ``` I think should be an easy and small ergonomics improvement for networking. Thanks!
… r=Xanewok save_analysis: fix some ICEs Fixes rust-lang#73020 Fixes rust-lang#73022 Fixes rust-lang#73041
📌 Commit 473e1a9 has been approved by |
bors
added
the
S-waiting-on-bors
Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion.
label
Jun 6, 2020
⌛ Testing commit 473e1a9 with merge fa28107cadfe8810520af6771a124fed49f5ef0a... |
💔 Test failed - checks-azure |
bors
added
S-waiting-on-review
Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties.
and removed
S-waiting-on-bors
Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion.
labels
Jun 6, 2020
Same failure as #73043 (comment)... |
It's probably #73046, which I didn't see was also in the overlap. |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Labels
rollup
A PR which is a rollup
S-waiting-on-review
Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Successful merges:
SourceFile
in new context' #70924.)Failed merges:
r? @ghost