-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 12.7k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Rollup of 8 pull requests #73190
Rollup of 8 pull requests #73190
Conversation
I wasn't aware items _could_ be fake, so I think having a function mentioning it could be helpful. Also, I'd need to make this change for cross-crate intra-doc links anyway, so I figured it's better to make the refactor separate.
This causes unnecessary calls to `grow` when the allocation would fit exactly in the remaining space.
They are pointless. No reasonable allocator will be able to satisfy a `reserve_in_place` request that *doubles* the size of an allocation when dealing with allocations that are 4 KiB and larger. Just to be sure, I confirmed on Linux that the `reserve_in_place` calls never succeed. (Note however that the `reserve_in_place` call for `DroplessArena::grow` did occasionally succeed prior to the off-by-one fix in the previous commit, because we would sometimes do a `reserve_in_place` request for the chunk's current size, which would trivially succeed!)
Also remove a now-unnecessary `placement` argument.
- Use `len` more consistently for the number of elements in a vector, because that's the usual name. - Use `additional` more consistently for the number of elements we want to add, because that's what `Vec::reserve()` uses. - Use `cap` consistently rather than `capacity`. - Plus a few other tweaks. This increases consistency and conciseness.
…ace, r=Amanieu Remove `RawVec::reserve_in_place`. And some related clean-ups. r? @oli-obk
…Gomez Add Item::is_fake for rustdoc I wasn't aware items _could_ be fake, so I think having a function mentioning it could be helpful. Also, I'd need to make this change for cross-crate intra-doc links anyway, so I figured it's better to make the refactor separate.
Resolve E0584 conflict Adds a new error code (`E0761`) to indicate ambiguity in module file names and an accompanying expanded description to resolve a conflict over `E0584`. Resolves rust-lang#73116
…an-DPC Clean up E0647 explanation r? @Dylan-DPC
…nas-schievink Enforce unwind invariants I had a quick look at rust-lang#72959. The failure message probably needs to be more detailed but I just wanted to check I got the right idea. I have no idea how to right a test for this either... r? @jonas-schievink Resolves rust-lang#72959 (hypothetically)
Fix a typo (size of the size)
typo: awailable -> available
Add mailmap entry
@bors r+ rollup=never p=8 |
📌 Commit 74380d7 has been approved by |
☀️ Test successful - checks-azure |
📣 Toolstate changed by #73190! Tested on commit bb86748. 💔 rls on windows: test-pass → build-fail (cc @Xanewok). |
Tested on commit rust-lang/rust@bb86748. Direct link to PR: <rust-lang/rust#73190> 💔 rls on windows: test-pass → build-fail (cc @Xanewok). 💔 rls on linux: test-pass → build-fail (cc @Xanewok). 💔 rustfmt on windows: test-pass → build-fail (cc @topecongiro). 💔 rustfmt on linux: test-pass → build-fail (cc @topecongiro).
Successful merges:
RawVec::reserve_in_place
. #72417 (RemoveRawVec::reserve_in_place
.)Failed merges:
r? @ghost