Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fix tooltip position if the documentation starts with a code block #74635

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jul 22, 2020

Conversation

GuillaumeGomez
Copy link
Member

@GuillaumeGomez GuillaumeGomez commented Jul 22, 2020

Fixes #74321.

Before:

before

After:

after

And in case there is text, it is not being applied:

after-witness

And on mobile it isn't needed so it's not "activated":

Screenshot from 2020-07-22 17-17-43

r? @rust-lang/rustdoc

@rust-highfive
Copy link
Collaborator

Some changes occurred in HTML/CSS/JS.

cc @GuillaumeGomez

@rust-highfive rust-highfive added the S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. label Jul 22, 2020
@Manishearth
Copy link
Member

@bors r+ rollup

@GuillaumeGomez can we set highfive to contain all actively reviewing rustdoc team members so that instead of pinging the entire team for each small PR it cycles through?

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Jul 22, 2020

📌 Commit 96225b1 has been approved by Manishearth

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Jul 22, 2020
@GuillaumeGomez
Copy link
Member Author

Normally it's already set: https://github.com/rust-lang/highfive/blob/master/highfive/configs/rust-lang/rust.json#L28

Next time I'll just not set a reviewer.

Manishearth added a commit to Manishearth/rust that referenced this pull request Jul 22, 2020
@Manishearth
Copy link
Member

Oh, lol. Yeah, I think we should @ the entire team for larger PRs.

bors added a commit to rust-lang-ci/rust that referenced this pull request Jul 22, 2020
…arth

Rollup of 9 pull requests

Successful merges:

 - rust-lang#73655 (va_args implementation for AAPCS.)
 - rust-lang#73893 (Stabilize control-flow-guard codegen option)
 - rust-lang#74237 (compiletest: Rewrite extract_*_version functions)
 - rust-lang#74454 (small coherence cleanup)
 - rust-lang#74528 (refactor and reword intra-doc link errors)
 - rust-lang#74568 (Apply rust-lang#66379 to `*mut T` `as_ref`)
 - rust-lang#74570 (Use forge links for prioritization procedure)
 - rust-lang#74589 (Update books)
 - rust-lang#74635 (Fix tooltip position if the documentation starts with a code block)

Failed merges:

r? @ghost
@bors bors merged commit 05a2466 into rust-lang:master Jul 22, 2020
@GuillaumeGomez GuillaumeGomez deleted the fix-tooltip-pos branch July 22, 2020 18:19
@cuviper cuviper added this to the 1.47.0 milestone May 2, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Badly positionned doc block toggle with code block annotation
5 participants