Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Clean up E0728 explanation #74720

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Aug 2, 2020
Merged

Conversation

GuillaumeGomez
Copy link
Member

@rust-highfive rust-highfive added the S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. label Jul 24, 2020
@jyn514
Copy link
Member

jyn514 commented Aug 1, 2020

@bors r+ rollup=always

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Aug 1, 2020

📌 Commit 4031645 has been approved by jyn514

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Aug 1, 2020
bors added a commit to rust-lang-ci/rust that referenced this pull request Aug 2, 2020
…arth

Rollup of 5 pull requests

Successful merges:

 - rust-lang#74602 (Clarify the doc for MaybeUninit::zeroed on incorrect use)
 - rust-lang#74720 (Clean up E0728 explanation)
 - rust-lang#74992 (fix rustdoc generic param order)
 - rust-lang#75015 (Add Vec::spare_capacity_mut)
 - rust-lang#75022 (Use a slice pattern instead of rchunks_exact(_).next())

Failed merges:

r? @ghost
@bors bors merged commit fac959b into rust-lang:master Aug 2, 2020
@GuillaumeGomez GuillaumeGomez deleted the cleanup-e0728 branch August 2, 2020 10:13
@cuviper cuviper added this to the 1.47.0 milestone May 2, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants