Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Simplify SyncOnceCell's
take
anddrop
. #76640Simplify SyncOnceCell's
take
anddrop
. #76640Changes from all commits
8a261a2
aa68aaa
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
There are no files selected for viewing
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
👍 I was thinking about removing
take_inner
as well (its contract is just weird), but I didn't know about those useful MaybeUninit helpers!There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
That's because they didn't exist yet. :) I added
assume_init_drop
in #76484 just a few days ago.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
So we leave some garbage bytes inside, but they are guarded by reseted
Once
? Nifty!There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
FWIW, previously this wrote
MaybeUninit::uninit()
which is equivalent to not writing anything, so we already left behind garbage before. (Just the compiler might find it easier this way as there are no uninit writes to eliminate.)There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The disassembly of this new version is slightly shorter. It seems to make one less copy. (Specifically for
SyncOnceCell<String>
at least.) But that's probably just the copy out ofself.value
intovalue
.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
It's also possible that the compiler just did not realize before that it was needlessly copying uninitialized memory.