Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Rollup of 10 pull requests #78197

Closed
wants to merge 29 commits into from
Closed

Rollup of 10 pull requests #78197

wants to merge 29 commits into from

Conversation

jonas-schievink
Copy link
Contributor

Successful merges:

Failed merges:

r? @ghost

nielx and others added 29 commits October 16, 2020 08:32
This resolves issues where the cross-build of LLVM fails because it tries to
link to the host's system libraries instead of the target's system libraries.
Writing any fmt::Arguments would trigger the inclusion of usize
formatting and padding code in the resulting binary, because indexing
used in fmt::write would generate code using panic_bounds_check, which
prints the index and length.

These bounds checks are not necessary, as fmt::Arguments never contains
any out-of-bounds indexes.

This change replaces them with unsafe get_unchecked, to reduce the
amount of generated code, which is especially important for embedded
targets.
In this instance, we can just pass a &str slice
and save an allocation.
.into() guarantees safety of the conversion.
Furthermore, the minimum value of all uints is known to be 0.
Since having enabled the download-ci-llvm option,
and having rebased on top of f05b47c,
I've noticed that I had to update the llvm-project
submodule manually if it was checked out.
Orignally, the submodule update logic was
introduced to reduce the friction for contributors
to manage the submodules, or in other words, to prevent
getting PRs that have unwanted submodule rollbacks
because the contributors didn't run git submodule update.

This commit adds logic to ensure there is no inadvertent
LLVM submodule rollback in a PR if download-ci-llvm
(or llvm-config) is enabled. It will detect whether the
llvm-project submodule is initialized, and if so, update
it in any case. If it is not initialized, behaviour is
kept to not do any update/initialization.

An alternative to the chosen implementation would
be to not pass the --init command line arg to
`git submodule update` for the src/llvm-project
submodule. This would show a confusing error message
however on all builds with an uninitialized repo.
We could pass the --silent param, but we still want
it to print something if it is initialized and has
to update something.
So we just do a manual check for whether the
submodule is initialized.
It checks that fmt::write by itself doesn't pull in any panicking or
or display code.
Mark inout asm! operands as used in liveness pass

Variables used in `inout` operands in inline assembly (that is, they're used as both input and output to some arbitrary assembly instruction) are being marked as read and written, but are not marked as being used in the RWU table during the liveness pass. This can result in such expressions triggering an unused variable lint warning. This is incorrect behavior- reads without uses are currently only used for compound assignments. We conservatively assume that an `inout` operand is being read and used in the context of the assembly instruction.

Closes #77915
Haiku: explicitly set CMAKE_SYSTEM_NAME when cross-compiling

This resolves issues where the cross-build of LLVM fails because it tries to
link to the host's system libraries instead of the target's system libraries.
…514,Nemo157

Greatly improve display for small mobile devices screens

Fixes #78014.

The biggest change being the "search bar". Instead of having everything on one line, I decided to move the search input on its own:

![Screenshot from 2020-10-18 21-54-26](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/3050060/96378530-c863a800-118c-11eb-8e82-a43fce312b5b.png)

Another change is that now, we "break words" in the listing so that they don't grow too big:

![Screenshot from 2020-10-18 21-57-17](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/3050060/96378555-ffd25480-118c-11eb-8a71-8f116c7edd93.png)

r? @jyn514
…eck, r=Mark-Simulacrum

Avoid panic_bounds_check in fmt::write.

Writing any fmt::Arguments would trigger the inclusion of usize formatting and padding code in the resulting binary, because indexing used in fmt::write would generate code using panic_bounds_check, which prints the index and length.

These bounds checks are not necessary, as fmt::Arguments never contains any out-of-bounds indexes.

This change replaces them with unsafe get_unchecked, to reduce the amount of generated code, which is especially important for embedded targets.

---

Demonstration of the size of and the symbols in a 'hello world' no_std binary:

<details>
<summary>Source code</summary>

```rust
#![feature(lang_items)]
#![feature(start)]
#![no_std]

use core::fmt;
use core::fmt::Write;

#[link(name = "c")]
extern "C" {
    #[allow(improper_ctypes)]
    fn write(fd: i32, s: &str) -> isize;
    fn exit(code: i32) -> !;
}

struct Stdout;

impl fmt::Write for Stdout {
    fn write_str(&mut self, s: &str) -> fmt::Result {
        unsafe { write(1, s) };
        Ok(())
    }
}

#[start]
fn main(_argc: isize, _argv: *const *const u8) -> isize {
    let _ = writeln!(Stdout, "Hello World");
    0
}

#[lang = "eh_personality"]
fn eh_personality() {}

#[panic_handler]
fn panic(_: &core::panic::PanicInfo) -> ! {
    unsafe { exit(1) };
}
```
</details>

Before:
```
   text	   data	    bss	    dec	    hex	filename
   6059	    736	      8	   6803	   1a93	before
```
```
0000000000001e00 T <T as core::any::Any>::type_id
0000000000003dd0 D core::fmt::num::DEC_DIGITS_LUT
0000000000001ce0 T core::fmt::num::imp::<impl core::fmt::Display for u64>::fmt
0000000000001ce0 T core::fmt::num::imp::<impl core::fmt::Display for usize>::fmt
0000000000001370 T core::fmt::write
0000000000001b30 t core::fmt::Formatter::pad_integral::write_prefix
0000000000001660 T core::fmt::Formatter::pad_integral
0000000000001350 T core::ops::function::FnOnce::call_once
0000000000001b80 t core::ptr::drop_in_place
0000000000001120 t core::ptr::drop_in_place
0000000000001c50 t core::iter::adapters::zip::Zip<A,B>::new
0000000000001c90 t core::iter::adapters::zip::Zip<A,B>::new
0000000000001b90 T core::panicking::panic_bounds_check
0000000000001c10 T core::panicking::panic_fmt
0000000000001130 t <&mut W as core::fmt::Write>::write_char
0000000000001200 t <&mut W as core::fmt::Write>::write_fmt
0000000000001250 t <&mut W as core::fmt::Write>::write_str
```

After:
```
   text	   data	    bss	    dec	    hex	filename
   3068	    600	      8	   3676	    e5c	after
```
```
0000000000001360 T core::fmt::write
0000000000001340 T core::ops::function::FnOnce::call_once
0000000000001120 t core::ptr::drop_in_place
0000000000001620 t core::iter::adapters::zip::Zip<A,B>::new
0000000000001660 t core::iter::adapters::zip::Zip<A,B>::new
0000000000001130 t <&mut W as core::fmt::Write>::write_char
0000000000001200 t <&mut W as core::fmt::Write>::write_fmt
0000000000001250 t <&mut W as core::fmt::Write>::write_str
```
…ulacrum

Sync LLVM submodule if it has been initialized

Since having enabled the download-ci-llvm option,
and having rebased on top of #76864,
I've noticed that I had to update the llvm-project
submodule manually if it was checked out.
Orignally, the submodule update logic was
introduced to reduce the friction for contributors
to manage the submodules, or in other words, to prevent
getting PRs that have unwanted submodule rollbacks
because the contributors didn't run git submodule update.

This commit adds logic to ensure there is no inadvertent
LLVM submodule rollback in a PR if download-ci-llvm
(or llvm-config) is enabled. It will detect whether the
llvm-project submodule is initialized, and if so, update
it in any case. If it is not initialized, behaviour is
kept to not do any update/initialization.

An alternative to the chosen implementation would
be to not pass the --init command line arg to
`git submodule update` for the src/llvm-project
submodule. This would show a confusing error message
however on all builds with an uninitialized repo.
We could pass the --silent param, but we still want
it to print something if it is initialized and has
to update something.
So we just do a manual check for whether the
submodule is initialized.
Fix two small issues in compiler/rustc_lint/src/types.rs

Two small improvements of `compiler/rustc_lint/src/types.rs`
…r=lcnr

Fixed build failure of `rustfmt`

Fixes #78079
r? @eddyb cc @bjorn3
Update cargo

3 commits in 79b397d72c557eb6444a2ba0dc00a211a226a35a..dd83ae55c871d94f060524656abab62ec40b4c40
2020-10-15 14:41:21 +0000 to 2020-10-20 19:31:26 +0000
- Support glob patterns for package/target selection (rust-lang/cargo#8752)
- Update env_logger requirement from 0.7.0 to 0.8.1 (rust-lang/cargo#8795)
- Fix man page links inside `option` blocks. (rust-lang/cargo#8793)
…-issue, r=withoutboats

Add tracking issue number for pin_static_ref

Forgot to add a tracking issue in #77726. Opened #78186 as tracking issue.
@jonas-schievink
Copy link
Contributor Author

@bors r+ rollup=never p=10

@rustbot modify labels: rollup

@rustbot rustbot added the rollup A PR which is a rollup label Oct 21, 2020
@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Oct 21, 2020

📌 Commit 891f3f7 has been approved by jonas-schievink

@bors bors added the S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. label Oct 21, 2020
@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Oct 21, 2020

⌛ Testing commit 891f3f7 with merge bc72d45d477acd26de0acf9a24a4504326b086b3...

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Oct 21, 2020

💔 Test failed - checks-actions

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. and removed S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. labels Oct 21, 2020
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
rollup A PR which is a rollup S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.