Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add popcount and popcnt as doc aliases for count_ones methods. #80097

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Dec 17, 2020

Conversation

SimonSapin
Copy link
Contributor

Integer types have a count_ones method that end up calling intrinsics::ctpop. On some architectures, that intrinsic is translated as a corresponding CPU instruction know as "popcount" or "popcnt".

This PR makes it so that searching for those names in rustdoc shows those methods.

CC https://blog.rust-lang.org/2020/11/19/Rust-1.48.html#adding-search-aliases

@rust-highfive
Copy link
Collaborator

r? @m-ou-se

(rust-highfive has picked a reviewer for you, use r? to override)

@rust-highfive rust-highfive added the S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. label Dec 16, 2020
@m-ou-se
Copy link
Member

m-ou-se commented Dec 16, 2020

Looks like you accidentally made two of these changes on count_zeros instead of count_ones.

But other than that, r=me.

Integer types have a `count_ones` method that end up calling
`intrinsics::ctpop`.
On some architectures, that intrinsic is translated as a corresponding
CPU instruction know as "popcount" or "popcnt".

This PR makes it so that searching for those names in rustdoc shows those methods.

CC https://blog.rust-lang.org/2020/11/19/Rust-1.48.html#adding-search-aliases
@SimonSapin
Copy link
Contributor Author

Good catch! Fixed

@m-ou-se
Copy link
Member

m-ou-se commented Dec 16, 2020

@bors r+ rollup

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Dec 16, 2020

📌 Commit f365de3 has been approved by m-ou-se

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Dec 16, 2020
bors added a commit to rust-lang-ci/rust that referenced this pull request Dec 17, 2020
Rollup of 11 pull requests

Successful merges:

 - rust-lang#79051 (Implement if-let match guards)
 - rust-lang#79877 (Allow `since="TBD"` for rustc_deprecated)
 - rust-lang#79882 (Fix issue rust-lang#78496)
 - rust-lang#80026 (expand-yaml-anchors: Make the output directory separator-insensitive)
 - rust-lang#80039 (Remove unused `TyEncoder::tcx` required method)
 - rust-lang#80069 (Test that `core::assert!` is valid)
 - rust-lang#80072 (Fixed conflict with drop elaboration and coverage)
 - rust-lang#80073 (Add support for target aliases)
 - rust-lang#80082 (Revert rust-lang#78790 - rust-src vendoring)
 - rust-lang#80097 (Add `popcount` and `popcnt` as doc aliases for `count_ones` methods.)
 - rust-lang#80103 (Remove docs for non-existent parameters in `rustc_expand`)

Failed merges:

r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
@bors bors merged commit e4735dd into rust-lang:master Dec 17, 2020
@rustbot rustbot added this to the 1.50.0 milestone Dec 17, 2020
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants