Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Make forget intrinsic safe #80477

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Dec 30, 2020
Merged

Make forget intrinsic safe #80477

merged 1 commit into from
Dec 30, 2020

Conversation

tmiasko
Copy link
Contributor

@tmiasko tmiasko commented Dec 29, 2020

No description provided.

@rust-highfive
Copy link
Collaborator

r? @dtolnay

(rust-highfive has picked a reviewer for you, use r? to override)

@rust-highfive rust-highfive added the S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. label Dec 29, 2020
@rust-log-analyzer
Copy link
Collaborator

The job mingw-check failed! Check out the build log: (web) (plain)

Click to see the possible cause of the failure (guessed by this bot)
configure: rust.channel         := nightly
configure: rust.debug-assertions := True
configure: llvm.assertions      := True
configure: dist.missing-tools   := True
configure: build.configure-args := ['--enable-sccache', '--disable-manage-submodu ...
configure: writing `config.toml` in current directory
configure: 
configure: run `python /checkout/x.py --help`
configure: 

Comment on lines 155 to 156
// SAFETY: the forget intrinsic could be safe, but there's no point in making it safe since
// we'll be implementing this function soon via `ManuallyDrop`
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Reassigning to @oli-obk, the person who authored the "there's no point in making it safe" comment.

@dtolnay
Copy link
Member

dtolnay commented Dec 29, 2020

r? @oli-obk

@rust-highfive rust-highfive assigned oli-obk and unassigned dtolnay Dec 29, 2020
@oli-obk
Copy link
Contributor

oli-obk commented Dec 29, 2020

🤷 I just considered the effort of doing a PR not worth it, but now that it's done, let's not let it go to waste

@bors r+ rollup

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Dec 29, 2020

📌 Commit 5718cc2 has been approved by oli-obk

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Dec 29, 2020
bors added a commit to rust-lang-ci/rust that referenced this pull request Dec 30, 2020
Rollup of 13 pull requests

Successful merges:

 - rust-lang#79812 (Lint on redundant trailing semicolon after item)
 - rust-lang#80348 (remove redundant clones (clippy::redundant_clone))
 - rust-lang#80358 (Edit rustc_span documentation)
 - rust-lang#80457 (Add missing commas to `rustc_ast_pretty::pp` docs)
 - rust-lang#80461 (Add llvm-libunwind change to bootstrap CHANGELOG)
 - rust-lang#80464 (Use Option::map_or instead of open coding it)
 - rust-lang#80465 (Fix typo in ffi-pure.md)
 - rust-lang#80467 (More uses of the matches! macro)
 - rust-lang#80469 (Fix small typo in time comment)
 - rust-lang#80472 (Use sans-serif font for the "all items" page links)
 - rust-lang#80477 (Make forget intrinsic safe)
 - rust-lang#80482 (don't clone copy types)
 - rust-lang#80487 (don't redundantly repeat field names)

Failed merges:

r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
@bors bors merged commit 9576ee9 into rust-lang:master Dec 30, 2020
@rustbot rustbot added this to the 1.51.0 milestone Dec 30, 2020
@tmiasko tmiasko deleted the safe-forget branch December 30, 2020 14:16
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

7 participants