-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 12.7k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Rollup of 6 pull requests #83778
Closed
Closed
Rollup of 6 pull requests #83778
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
When other errors are generated, there can be a mismatch between the amount of input types in MIR, and the amount in the function itself. Break from the comparative loop if this is the case to prevent out-of-bounds.
Add a test that has the right input to trigger an out-of-bounds error when in MIR the local_decls and the normalized_input_tys don't match in amount.
Instead, only load the crates that are linked to with intra-doc links. This doesn't help very much with any of rustdoc's fundamental issues with freezing the resolver, but it at least fixes a stable-to-stable regression, and makes the crate loading model somewhat more consistent with rustc's.
Beginning with FreeBSD 10.4 and 11.1, there is one guard page by default. And the stack autoresizes, so if Rust allocates its own guard page, then FreeBSD's will simply move up one page. The best solution is to just use the OS's guard page.
…r=nikomatsakis Break when there is a mismatch in the type count When other errors are generated, there can be a mismatch between the amount of input types in MIR, and the amount in the function itself. Break from the comparative loop if this is the case to prevent out-of-bounds. Fixes rust-lang#83499
…rochenkov rustdoc: Don't load all extern crates unconditionally Instead, only load the crates that are linked to with intra-doc links. This doesn't help very much with any of rustdoc's fundamental issues with freezing the resolver, but it at least fixes a stable-to-stable regression, and makes the crate loading model somewhat more consistent with rustc's. I tested and it unfortunately does not help at all with rust-lang#82496. Closes rust-lang#68427. Let me know if you want me to open a separate issue for not freezing the resolver. r? ``@petrochenkov`` cc ``@eddyb`` ``@ollie27``
Fix comment typo in once.rs I believe I came across a minor typo in a comment. I am not particularly familiar with this part of the codebase, but I have read the surrounding code as well as the referenced `park` and `unpark` functions, and I believe my proposed change is true to the intended meaning of the comment. I intentionally tried to keep the change as minimal as possible. If I have the maintainers' permission, I'd also love to add a comma to improve readability as follows: `Luckily ``park`` comes with the guarantee that if it got an ``unpark`` just before on an unparked thread, it does not park.`
…mulacrum Add my new email address to .mailmap
…, r=jyn514 Add test to ensure search tabs behaviour It adds a GUI test for rust-lang#80382. r? ``@jyn514``
…tolnay Fix stack overflow detection on FreeBSD 11.1+ Beginning with FreeBSD 10.4 and 11.1, there is one guard page by default. And the stack autoresizes, so if Rust allocates its own guard page, then FreeBSD's will simply move up one page. The best solution is to just use the OS's guard page.
@bors r+ p=6 rollup=never |
📌 Commit b98eea4 has been approved by |
bors
added
the
S-waiting-on-bors
Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion.
label
Apr 2, 2021
⌛ Testing commit b98eea4 with merge 85678b4faa15ebcce16c8f6c814c89ee3985f4e3... |
The job Click to see the possible cause of the failure (guessed by this bot)
|
💔 Test failed - checks-actions |
bors
added
S-waiting-on-review
Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties.
and removed
S-waiting-on-bors
Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion.
labels
Apr 2, 2021
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Labels
rollup
A PR which is a rollup
S-waiting-on-review
Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Successful merges:
Failed merges:
r? @ghost
@rustbot modify labels: rollup
Create a similar rollup