Remove DropGuard in sys::windows::process and use StaticMutex instead
#84663
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
rustbot
added
the
T-libs
|
(rust-highfive has picked a reviewer for you, use r? to override) |
rust-highfive
added
the
S-waiting-on-review
|
@bors r+ rollup |
|
📌 Commit 1ac6326 has been approved by |
bors
added
S-waiting-on-bors
m-ou-se
added a commit
to m-ou-se/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Apr 28, 2021
Remove `DropGuard` in `sys::windows::process` and use `StaticMutex` instead `StaticMutex` is a mutex that when locked provides a guard that unlocks the mutex again when dropped, thus provides the exact same functionality as `DropGuard`. `StaticMutex` is used in more places, and is thus preferred over an ad-hoc construct like `DropGuard`. `@rustbot` label: +T-libs-impl
jackh726
added a commit
to jackh726/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Apr 28, 2021
Remove `DropGuard` in `sys::windows::process` and use `StaticMutex` instead `StaticMutex` is a mutex that when locked provides a guard that unlocks the mutex again when dropped, thus provides the exact same functionality as `DropGuard`. `StaticMutex` is used in more places, and is thus preferred over an ad-hoc construct like `DropGuard`. ``@rustbot`` label: +T-libs-impl
jackh726
added a commit
to jackh726/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Apr 29, 2021
Remove `DropGuard` in `sys::windows::process` and use `StaticMutex` instead `StaticMutex` is a mutex that when locked provides a guard that unlocks the mutex again when dropped, thus provides the exact same functionality as `DropGuard`. `StaticMutex` is used in more places, and is thus preferred over an ad-hoc construct like `DropGuard`. ```@rustbot``` label: +T-libs-impl
bors
added a commit
to rust-lang-ci/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Apr 29, 2021
Rollup of 11 pull requests Successful merges: - rust-lang#84484 (Don't rebuild rustdoc and clippy after checking bootstrap) - rust-lang#84530 (`test tidy` should ignore alternative `build` dir patterns) - rust-lang#84531 (Ignore commented out lines when finding features) - rust-lang#84540 (Build sanitizers for x86_64-unknown-linux-musl) - rust-lang#84555 (Set `backtrace-on-ice` by default for compiler and codegen profiles) - rust-lang#84585 (Add `x.py check src/librustdoc` as an alias for `x.py check src/tools/rustdoc`) - rust-lang#84636 (rustdoc: change aliases attribute to data-aliases) - rust-lang#84646 (Add some regression tests related to rust-lang#82494) - rust-lang#84661 (Remove extra word in `rustc_mir` docs) - rust-lang#84663 (Remove `DropGuard` in `sys::windows::process` and use `StaticMutex` instead) - rust-lang#84668 (Update books) Failed merges: r? `@ghost` `@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
StaticMutexis a mutex that when locked provides a guard that unlocks the mutex again when dropped, thus provides the exact same functionality asDropGuard.StaticMutexis used in more places, and is thus preferred over an ad-hoc construct likeDropGuard.@rustbot label: +T-libs-impl