Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Better English for documenting when to use unimplemented!() #85644

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
May 25, 2021

Conversation

tialaramex
Copy link
Contributor

I don't think "plan of using" is correct here. I considered "plan on using" but eventually decided "plan to use" is better.

@rust-highfive
Copy link
Collaborator

Thanks for the pull request, and welcome! The Rust team is excited to review your changes, and you should hear from @dtolnay (or someone else) soon.

If any changes to this PR are deemed necessary, please add them as extra commits. This ensures that the reviewer can see what has changed since they last reviewed the code. Due to the way GitHub handles out-of-date commits, this should also make it reasonably obvious what issues have or haven't been addressed. Large or tricky changes may require several passes of review and changes.

Please see the contribution instructions for more information.

@rust-highfive rust-highfive added the S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. label May 24, 2021
Copy link
Member

@dtolnay dtolnay left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thank you!

@dtolnay
Copy link
Member

dtolnay commented May 24, 2021

@bors r+ rollup=always

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented May 24, 2021

📌 Commit 54ccf95 has been approved by dtolnay

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels May 24, 2021
GuillaumeGomez added a commit to GuillaumeGomez/rust that referenced this pull request May 25, 2021
Better English for documenting when to use unimplemented!()

I don't think "plan of using" is correct here. I considered "plan on using" but eventually decided "plan to use" is better.
This was referenced May 25, 2021
bors added a commit to rust-lang-ci/rust that referenced this pull request May 25, 2021
…laumeGomez

Rollup of 6 pull requests

Successful merges:

 - rust-lang#85361 (Use TargetTriple::from_path in rustdoc)
 - rust-lang#85605 (Replace Local::new(1) with CAPTURE_STRUCT_LOCAL)
 - rust-lang#85631 (Move keyword primitive css dom)
 - rust-lang#85644 (Better English for documenting when to use unimplemented!())
 - rust-lang#85650 (Add some backticks to the `rustc_middle::ty::adjustment::Adjustment` docs)
 - rust-lang#85657 (Remove doubled braces in non_exhaustive structs’ documentation text.)

Failed merges:

r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
@bors bors merged commit 4661559 into rust-lang:master May 25, 2021
@rustbot rustbot added this to the 1.54.0 milestone May 25, 2021
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants