Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[experiment] expand: Make #[derive(A, B, ...)] cfg-eval its input only for A, B, ... #86057

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

petrochenkov
Copy link
Contributor

The second item from #83824 (comment).

@rust-highfive
Copy link
Collaborator

r? @matthewjasper

(rust-highfive has picked a reviewer for you, use r? to override)

@rust-highfive rust-highfive added the S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. label Jun 6, 2021
@petrochenkov
Copy link
Contributor Author

@bors try @rust-timer queue

@rust-timer
Copy link
Collaborator

Awaiting bors try build completion.

@rustbot label: +S-waiting-on-perf

@rustbot rustbot added the S-waiting-on-perf Status: Waiting on a perf run to be completed. label Jun 6, 2021
@petrochenkov petrochenkov removed the S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. label Jun 6, 2021
@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Jun 6, 2021

⌛ Trying commit e45d869 with merge f980a6509ca6ba43d60fdc29723f7b3c7b8497f1...

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Jun 6, 2021

☀️ Try build successful - checks-actions
Build commit: f980a6509ca6ba43d60fdc29723f7b3c7b8497f1 (f980a6509ca6ba43d60fdc29723f7b3c7b8497f1)

@rust-timer
Copy link
Collaborator

Queued f980a6509ca6ba43d60fdc29723f7b3c7b8497f1 with parent 3740ba2, future comparison URL.

@rust-timer
Copy link
Collaborator

Finished benchmarking try commit (f980a6509ca6ba43d60fdc29723f7b3c7b8497f1): comparison url.

Benchmarking this pull request likely means that it is perf-sensitive, so we're automatically marking it as not fit for rolling up. Please note that if the perf results are neutral, you should likely undo the rollup=never given below by specifying rollup- to bors.

Importantly, though, if the results of this run are non-neutral do not roll this PR up -- it will mask other regressions or improvements in the roll up.

@bors rollup=never
@rustbot label: +S-waiting-on-review -S-waiting-on-perf

@rustbot rustbot added S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. and removed S-waiting-on-perf Status: Waiting on a perf run to be completed. labels Jun 6, 2021
@petrochenkov
Copy link
Contributor Author

Not a regression.

JohnTitor added a commit to JohnTitor/rust that referenced this pull request Jun 21, 2021
expand: Move some more derive logic to rustc_builtin_macros

And cleanup some `unwrap`s in `cfg_eval`.

Refactorings extracted from rust-lang#83354 and rust-lang#86057.
r? `@Aaron1011`
JohnTitor added a commit to JohnTitor/rust that referenced this pull request Jun 21, 2021
expand: Move some more derive logic to rustc_builtin_macros

And cleanup some `unwrap`s in `cfg_eval`.

Refactorings extracted from rust-lang#83354 and rust-lang#86057.
r? ``@Aaron1011``
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants