-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 12.8k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Link reference in dyn
keyword documentation
#86141
Merged
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
The "read more" sentence formatted "object safety" as inline code instead of providing a link to more information. This PR adds a link to the Reference about this matter, as well as the page regarding trait objects.
r? @kennytm (rust-highfive has picked a reviewer for you, use r? to override) |
rust-highfive
added
the
S-waiting-on-review
Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties.
label
Jun 8, 2021
@bors r+ rollup |
📌 Commit 7728476 has been approved by |
bors
added
S-waiting-on-bors
Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion.
and removed
S-waiting-on-review
Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties.
labels
Jun 16, 2021
GuillaumeGomez
added a commit
to GuillaumeGomez/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Jun 16, 2021
…d, r=kennytm Link reference in `dyn` keyword documentation The "read more" sentence formatted "object safety" as inline code instead of providing a link to more information. This PR adds a link to the Reference about this matter, as well as the page regarding trait objects. --- We could also put these links in the very first line (instead of the link to the Book) and in the first paragraph which mentions the "object safe" requirement. Personally, I think it's good to keep the link to the Book up-front as it's more accessible than the Reference.
bors
added a commit
to rust-lang-ci/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Jun 16, 2021
Rollup of 10 pull requests Successful merges: - rust-lang#85870 (Allow whitespace in dump_mir filter) - rust-lang#86104 (Fix span calculation in format strings) - rust-lang#86140 (Mention the `Borrow` guarantee on the `Hash` implementations for Arrays and `Vec`) - rust-lang#86141 (Link reference in `dyn` keyword documentation) - rust-lang#86260 (Open trait implementations' toggles by default.) - rust-lang#86339 (Mention rust-lang#79078 on compatibility notes of 1.52) - rust-lang#86341 (Stop returning a value from `report_assert_as_lint`) - rust-lang#86353 (Remove `projection_ty_from_predicates`) - rust-lang#86361 (Add missing backslashes to prevent unwanted newlines in rustdoc HTML) - rust-lang#86372 (Typo correction: s/is/its) Failed merges: r? `@ghost` `@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Labels
S-waiting-on-bors
Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
The "read more" sentence formatted "object safety" as inline code
instead of providing a link to more information. This PR adds a link
to the Reference about this matter, as well as the page regarding trait
objects.
We could also put these links in the very first line (instead of the link to the
Book) and in the first paragraph which mentions the "object safe" requirement.
Personally, I think it's good to keep the link to the Book up-front as it's more
accessible than the Reference.