Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Rollup of 4 pull requests #94120

Closed
wants to merge 8 commits into from

Conversation

matthiaskrgr
Copy link
Member

Successful merges:

Failed merges:

r? @ghost
@rustbot modify labels: rollup

Create a similar rollup

m-ou-se and others added 8 commits February 4, 2022 12:27
Co-authored-by: Jubilee Young <workingjubilee@gmail.com>
As an example:

    #[test]
    #[ignore = "not yet implemented"]
    fn test_ignored() {
        ...
    }

Will now render as:

    running 2 tests
    test tests::test_ignored ... ignored, not yet implemented

    test result: ok. 1 passed; 0 failed; 1 ignored; 0 measured; 0 filtered out; finished in 0.00s
…ulacrum

Provide ignore message in the result of test

Provide ignore the message in the result of the test.

This PR does not need RFC, because it is about the presentation of the report of `cargo test`.

However, the following document listed here helps you to know about PR.

- [RFC](rust-lang/rfcs#3217)
- [Rendered](https://github.com/yanganto/rfcs/blob/ignore-test-message/text/0000-ignore-test-message.md)
- [Previous discussion on IRLO](https://internals.rust-lang.org/t/pre-rfc-provide-ignore-message-when-the-test-ignored/15904)

If there is something improper, please let me know.
Thanks.
…iplett

core: Implement ASCII trim functions on byte slices

Hi `@rust-lang/libs!` This is a feature that I wished for when implementing serial protocols with microcontrollers. Often these protocols may contain leading or trailing whitespace, which needs to be removed. Because oftentimes drivers will operate on the byte level, decoding to unicode and checking for unicode whitespace is unnecessary overhead.

This PR adds three new methods to byte slices:

- `trim_ascii_start`
- `trim_ascii_end`
- `trim_ascii`

I did not find any pre-existing discussions about this, which surprises me a bit. Maybe I'm missing something, and this functionality is already possible through other means? There's rust-lang/rfcs#2547 ("Trim methods on slices"), but that has a different purpose.

As per the [std dev guide](https://std-dev-guide.rust-lang.org/feature-lifecycle/new-unstable-features.html), this is a proposed implementation without any issue / RFC. If this is the wrong process, please let me know. However, I thought discussing code is easier than discussing a mere idea, and hacking on the stdlib was fun.

Tracking issue: rust-lang#94035
…=Mark-Simulacrum

Destabilise entry_insert

See: rust-lang#90345

I didn't revert the rename that was done in that PR, I left it as `entry_insert`.

Additionally, before that PR, `VacantEntry::insert_entry` seemingly had no stability attribute on it? I kept the attribute, just made it an unstable one, same as the one on `Entry`.

There didn't seem to be any mention of this in the RELEASES.md, so I don't think there's anything for me to do other than this?
@rustbot rustbot added T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. T-rustdoc Relevant to the rustdoc team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. rollup A PR which is a rollup labels Feb 18, 2022
@matthiaskrgr
Copy link
Member Author

@bors r+ rollup=never p=4

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Feb 18, 2022

📌 Commit 1b45f76 has been approved by matthiaskrgr

@bors bors added the S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. label Feb 18, 2022
@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Feb 18, 2022

⌛ Testing commit 1b45f76 with merge 2471287ee0ce7fcf0d8cb53a30e0706dffb9e9e8...

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Feb 18, 2022

💔 Test failed - checks-actions

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. and removed S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. labels Feb 18, 2022
@rust-log-analyzer
Copy link
Collaborator

A job failed! Check out the build log: (web) (plain)

Click to see the possible cause of the failure (guessed by this bot)

@matthiaskrgr
Copy link
Member Author

@bors retry dist-x86_64-apple failure/hang without any logs

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Feb 18, 2022
@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Feb 18, 2022

⌛ Testing commit 1b45f76 with merge 05b8d942ac5704182ab29d87aaa390181d3d3040...

@rust-log-analyzer
Copy link
Collaborator

A job failed! Check out the build log: (web) (plain)

Click to see the possible cause of the failure (guessed by this bot)

@matthiaskrgr
Copy link
Member Author

No logs again... 🙄 whatever..

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
rollup A PR which is a rollup S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. T-rustdoc Relevant to the rustdoc team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

8 participants