[beta] Branch 1.60 beta

[Mark-Simulacrum]

r? @Mark-Simulacrum

[rust-highfive]

⚠️ Warning ⚠️

• Pull requests are usually filed against the master branch for this repo, but this one is against beta. Please double check that you specified the right target!

[Mark-Simulacrum]

@bors r+ rollup=never p=5

[bors]

📌 Commit e5c9e1e has been approved by Mark-Simulacrum

[Mark-Simulacrum]

nightly_only_test here seems likely to be a little problematic for the future -- probably needs to be revised to avoid fully cfg'ing away the test but rather to mark it as ignore or something like that, at least.

[Mark-Simulacrum]

@bors r+ rollup=never p=5

[bors]

📌 Commit 95cf544 has been approved by Mark-Simulacrum

[bors]

⌛ Testing commit 95cf544 with merge e51ce066011d7442abf98867f05ab308bd88d165...

[bors]

💔 Test failed - checks-actions

[pietroalbini]

nightly_only_test here seems likely to be a little problematic for the future -- probably needs to be revised to avoid fully cfg'ing away the test but rather to mark it as ignore or something like that, at least.

Hmm, how was that not catched by the stable builder?

[Mark-Simulacrum]

nightly_only_test here seems likely to be a little problematic for the future -- probably needs to be revised to avoid fully cfg'ing away the test but rather to mark it as ignore or something like that, at least.

Hmm, how was that not catched by the stable builder?

rustfmt isn't tested/built on the stable builder, since it's a tool and those aren't checked by x86_64-gnu (the 'template' the stable builder uses).

[Mark-Simulacrum]

Filed racer-rust/racer#1177 to fix racer builds (will need a cargo update at minimum) on parallel rustc, but will try to push up a temporary disable of RLS builds for alt.

[Mark-Simulacrum]

@bors r+ rollup=never p=5

[bors]

📌 Commit 07493dd has been approved by Mark-Simulacrum

[calebcartwright]

nightly_only_test here seems likely to be a little problematic for the future -- probably needs to be revised to avoid fully cfg'ing away the test but rather to mark it as ignore or something like that, at least.

happy to chat about this offline to get a better understanding of the concern. i'm a bit puzzled by the failure at first blush because I thought we had sufficiently tricked one matrix of our own CI to think the tests were being executed in a non-nightly, and would've expected this to fail there.

apologies!

[bors]

⌛ Testing commit 07493dd with merge 308ff258fd84f6ba195b2d439371d33cb4f4f8fa...

[rust-log-analyzer]

A job failed! Check out the build log: (web) (plain)

Click to see the possible cause of the failure (guessed by this bot)

[bors]

💔 Test failed - checks-actions

[Mark-Simulacrum]

@bors retry
The hosted runner: GitHub Actions 3 lost communication with the server. Anything in your workflow that terminates the runner process, starves it for CPU/Memory, or blocks its network access can cause this error.

[bors]

⌛ Testing commit 07493dd with merge 0a4f984...

[bors]

☀️ Test successful - checks-actions
Approved by: Mark-Simulacrum
Pushing 0a4f984 to beta...