Rollup of 7 pull requests #94251
Closed
Rollup of 7 pull requests #94251
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This avoids a situation where a file is at the border of the limit, and alternates between hitting the limit and not hitting it, causing a back and forth of addition of the ignore-tidy-linelength directive. As an example, consider the ignore-tidy-filelength of compiler/rustc_typeck/src/collect.rs. It was added in 2ca4964, removed in 37354eb, added again in 448d076, removed in 3171bd5, added in 438826f, and rust-lang#94142 is going to remove it again. To avoid this back and forth, we exempt files from the unneccessary ignoring warning that have length of at least 70% of the limit.
Before: ``` error: jsondocck failed! status: exit status: 1 command: "/data/ne321/rust/build/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/stage0-tools-bin/jsondocck" "--doc-dir" "/data/ne321/rust/build/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/test/rustdoc-json/traits/supertrait" "--template" "/data/ne321/rust/src/test/rustdoc-json/traits/supertrait.rs" stdout: ------------------------------------------ ------------------------------------------ stderr: ------------------------------------------ Invalid command: Tried to use the previous path in the first command on line 10 Error: "Jsondocck failed for /data/ne321/rust/src/test/rustdoc-json/traits/supertrait.rs" ------------------------------------------ Rustdoc Output: status: exit status: 0 command: "/data/ne321/rust/build/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/stage2/bin/rustdoc" "-L" "/data/ne321/rust/build/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/stage2/lib/rustlib/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/lib" "-L" "/data/ne321/rust/build/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/test/rustdoc-json/traits/supertrait/auxiliary" "-o" "/data/ne321/rust/build/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/test/rustdoc-json/traits/supertrait" "--deny" "warnings" "/data/ne321/rust/src/test/rustdoc-json/traits/supertrait.rs" "--output-format" "json" "-Zunstable-options" stdout: ------------------------------------------ ------------------------------------------ stderr: ------------------------------------------ ------------------------------------------ ``` After: ``` error: jsondocck failed! status: exit status: 1 command: "/data/ne321/rust/build/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/stage0-tools-bin/jsondocck" "--doc-dir" "/data/ne321/rust/build/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/test/rustdoc-json/traits/supertrait" "--template" "/data/ne321/rust/src/test/rustdoc-json/traits/supertrait.rs" stdout: none --- stderr ------------------------------- Invalid command: Tried to use the previous path in the first command on line 10 Error: "Jsondocck failed for /data/ne321/rust/src/test/rustdoc-json/traits/supertrait.rs" ------------------------------------------ Rustdoc Output: status: exit status: 0 command: "/data/ne321/rust/build/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/stage2/bin/rustdoc" "-L" "/data/ne321/rust/build/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/stage2/lib/rustlib/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/lib" "-L" "/data/ne321/rust/build/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/test/rustdoc-json/traits/supertrait/auxiliary" "-o" "/data/ne321/rust/build/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/test/rustdoc-json/traits/supertrait" "--deny" "warnings" "/data/ne321/rust/src/test/rustdoc-json/traits/supertrait.rs" "--output-format" "json" "-Zunstable-options" stdout: none stderr: none ```
The #[allow(...)] directive was tested for the body and the pattern, but non-presence of it wasn't tested. Furthermore, it wasn't tested for the expression. We add expression tests as well as ones checking the non-presence of the directive.
This is already handled by supported_types().
The previous approach of checking for the reserve-r9 target feature didn't actually work because LLVM only sets this feature very late when initializing the per-function subtarget.
Checking of asm! register operands now properly takes function attributes such as #[target_feature] and #[instruction_set] into account.
…crum Update libc to 0.2.118 Updating libc to 0.2.118 adds platform support for m68k-unknown-linux-gnu.
Fix several asm! related issues This is a combination of several fixes, each split into a separate commit. Splitting these into PRs is not practical since they conflict with each other. Fixes rust-lang#92378 Fixes rust-lang#85247 r? `@nagisa`
…Simulacrum tidy: fire less "ignoring file length unneccessarily" warnings This avoids a situation where a file is at the border of the limit, and alternates between hitting the limit and not hitting it, causing a back and forth of addition of the ignore-tidy-linelength directive. As an example, consider the ignore-tidy-filelength of compiler/rustc_typeck/src/collect.rs. It was added in 2ca4964, removed in 37354eb (a revert of the earlier commit), added again in 448d076, removed in 3171bd5, added in 438826f, and removed in bb0a2f9. To avoid this back and forth, we exempt files from the unneccessary ignoring warning that have length of at least 70% of the limit.
…kennytm solarish current_exe using libc call directly
…=Mark-Simulacrum compiletest: Print process output info with less whitespace Before: ``` error: jsondocck failed! status: exit status: 1 command: "/data/ne321/rust/build/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/stage0-tools-bin/jsondocck" "--doc-dir" "/data/ne321/rust/build/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/test/rustdoc-json/traits/supertrait" "--template" "/data/ne321/rust/src/test/rustdoc-json/traits/supertrait.rs" stdout: ------------------------------------------ ------------------------------------------ stderr: ------------------------------------------ Invalid command: Tried to use the previous path in the first command on line 10 Error: "Jsondocck failed for /data/ne321/rust/src/test/rustdoc-json/traits/supertrait.rs" ------------------------------------------ Rustdoc Output: status: exit status: 0 command: "/data/ne321/rust/build/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/stage2/bin/rustdoc" "-L" "/data/ne321/rust/build/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/stage2/lib/rustlib/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/lib" "-L" "/data/ne321/rust/build/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/test/rustdoc-json/traits/supertrait/auxiliary" "-o" "/data/ne321/rust/build/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/test/rustdoc-json/traits/supertrait" "--deny" "warnings" "/data/ne321/rust/src/test/rustdoc-json/traits/supertrait.rs" "--output-format" "json" "-Zunstable-options" stdout: ------------------------------------------ ------------------------------------------ stderr: ------------------------------------------ ------------------------------------------ ``` After: ``` error: jsondocck failed! status: exit status: 1 command: "/data/ne321/rust/build/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/stage0-tools-bin/jsondocck" "--doc-dir" "/data/ne321/rust/build/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/test/rustdoc-json/traits/supertrait" "--template" "/data/ne321/rust/src/test/rustdoc-json/traits/supertrait.rs" stdout: none --- stderr ------------------------------- Invalid command: Tried to use the previous path in the first command on line 10 Error: "Jsondocck failed for /data/ne321/rust/src/test/rustdoc-json/traits/supertrait.rs" ------------------------------------------ Rustdoc Output: status: exit status: 0 command: "/data/ne321/rust/build/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/stage2/bin/rustdoc" "-L" "/data/ne321/rust/build/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/stage2/lib/rustlib/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/lib" "-L" "/data/ne321/rust/build/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/test/rustdoc-json/traits/supertrait/auxiliary" "-o" "/data/ne321/rust/build/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/test/rustdoc-json/traits/supertrait" "--deny" "warnings" "/data/ne321/rust/src/test/rustdoc-json/traits/supertrait.rs" "--output-format" "json" "-Zunstable-options" stdout: none stderr: none ```
Add the let else tests found missing in the stabilization report In the stabilization report of `let else`, in rust-lang#93628, I found various cases which weren't tested. This PR adds them.
ScalarMaybeUninit is explicitly hexadecimal in its formatting This makes `ScalarMaybeUninit` consistent with `Scalar` after the changes in rust-lang#94189. r? `@oli-obk`
rustbot
added
T-compiler
|
@bors r+ rollup=never p=7 |
|
📌 Commit 72e913f has been approved by |
bors
added
the
S-waiting-on-bors
|
⌛ Testing commit 72e913f with merge 59f57923eb1fd418e71323dcf67cfa56c69b1966... |
|
The job Click to see the possible cause of the failure (guessed by this bot) |
|
💔 Test failed - checks-actions |
bors
added
S-waiting-on-review
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Successful merges:
Failed merges:
r? @ghost
@rustbot modify labels: rollup
Create a similar rollup