-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 12.7k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Revert "Auto merge of #92419 - erikdesjardins:coldland, r=nagisa" #94402
Conversation
Some changes occured to rustc_codegen_gcc cc @antoyo |
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
51d9884
to
45cc025
Compare
r? @nagisa I am not on the compiler team, so I'm not the appropriate person to review this. |
@bors r+ I'm not sure |
📌 Commit 45cc025dc6a0f1ad9bfc871d681bbf89492fdc1b has been approved by |
@bors rollup=never |
⌛ Testing commit 45cc025dc6a0f1ad9bfc871d681bbf89492fdc1b with merge 356f72f628f5edf19815d1aa1cf0a8d62c51a178... |
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
💔 Test failed - checks-actions |
☔ The latest upstream changes (presumably #94221) made this pull request unmergeable. Please resolve the merge conflicts. |
45cc025
to
0c78433
Compare
@bors r=nagisa |
📌 Commit 0c78433 has been approved by |
☀️ Test successful - checks-actions |
Finished benchmarking commit (4a56cbe): comparison url. Summary: This benchmark run shows 9 relevant improvements 🎉 but 152 relevant regressions 😿 to instruction counts.
If you disagree with this performance assessment, please file an issue in rust-lang/rustc-perf. Next Steps: If you can justify the regressions found in this perf run, please indicate this with @rustbot label: +perf-regression |
…=nikic Rebased: Mark drop calls in landing pads cold instead of noinline I noticed that certain inlining optimizations were missing while staring at some compiled code output. I'd like to see this relanded, so I rebased the PR from ``@erikdesjardins`` (PR rust-lang#94823). This PR reapplies rust-lang#92419, which was reverted in rust-lang#94402 due to rust-lang#94390. Fixes rust-lang#46515, fixes rust-lang#87055. Update: fixes rust-lang#97217.
…ikic Rebased: Mark drop calls in landing pads cold instead of noinline I noticed that certain inlining optimizations were missing while staring at some compiled code output. I'd like to see this relanded, so I rebased the PR from `@erikdesjardins` (PR rust-lang#94823). This PR reapplies rust-lang#92419, which was reverted in rust-lang#94402 due to rust-lang#94390. Fixes rust-lang#46515, fixes rust-lang#87055. Update: fixes rust-lang#97217.
…ikic Rebased: Mark drop calls in landing pads cold instead of noinline I noticed that certain inlining optimizations were missing while staring at some compiled code output. I'd like to see this relanded, so I rebased the PR from `@erikdesjardins` (PR rust-lang#94823). This PR reapplies rust-lang#92419, which was reverted in rust-lang#94402 due to rust-lang#94390. Fixes rust-lang#46515, fixes rust-lang#87055. Update: fixes rust-lang#97217.
Rebased: Mark drop calls in landing pads cold instead of noinline I noticed that certain inlining optimizations were missing while staring at some compiled code output. I'd like to see this relanded, so I rebased the PR from `@erikdesjardins` (PR #94823). This PR reapplies rust-lang/rust#92419, which was reverted in rust-lang/rust#94402 due to rust-lang/rust#94390. Fixes rust-lang/rust#46515, fixes rust-lang/rust#87055. Update: fixes #97217.
Should fix (untested) #94390
Reopens #46515, #87055
r? @ehuss