Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Revert "Auto merge of #92419 - erikdesjardins:coldland, r=nagisa" #94402

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Mar 1, 2022

Conversation

erikdesjardins
Copy link
Contributor

Should fix (untested) #94390

Reopens #46515, #87055

r? @ehuss

@rustbot rustbot added the T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. label Feb 26, 2022
@rust-highfive
Copy link
Collaborator

Some changes occured to rustc_codegen_gcc

cc @antoyo

@rust-highfive rust-highfive added the S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. label Feb 26, 2022
@rust-log-analyzer

This comment has been minimized.

@ehuss
Copy link
Contributor

ehuss commented Feb 26, 2022

r? @nagisa

I am not on the compiler team, so I'm not the appropriate person to review this.

@rust-highfive rust-highfive assigned nagisa and unassigned ehuss Feb 26, 2022
@nagisa
Copy link
Member

nagisa commented Feb 26, 2022

@bors r+

I'm not sure Reopens does anything, so I went ahead and reopened them manually.

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Feb 26, 2022

📌 Commit 45cc025dc6a0f1ad9bfc871d681bbf89492fdc1b has been approved by nagisa

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Feb 26, 2022
@matthiaskrgr
Copy link
Member

@bors rollup=never

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Feb 27, 2022

⌛ Testing commit 45cc025dc6a0f1ad9bfc871d681bbf89492fdc1b with merge 356f72f628f5edf19815d1aa1cf0a8d62c51a178...

@rust-log-analyzer

This comment has been minimized.

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Feb 27, 2022

💔 Test failed - checks-actions

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. and removed S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. labels Feb 27, 2022
@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Feb 27, 2022

☔ The latest upstream changes (presumably #94221) made this pull request unmergeable. Please resolve the merge conflicts.

@Dylan-DPC
Copy link
Member

@bors r=nagisa

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Mar 1, 2022

📌 Commit 0c78433 has been approved by nagisa

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Mar 1, 2022
@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Mar 1, 2022

⌛ Testing commit 0c78433 with merge 4a56cbe...

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Mar 1, 2022

☀️ Test successful - checks-actions
Approved by: nagisa
Pushing 4a56cbe to master...

@bors bors added the merged-by-bors This PR was explicitly merged by bors. label Mar 1, 2022
@bors bors merged commit 4a56cbe into rust-lang:master Mar 1, 2022
@rustbot rustbot added this to the 1.61.0 milestone Mar 1, 2022
@rust-timer
Copy link
Collaborator

Finished benchmarking commit (4a56cbe): comparison url.

Summary: This benchmark run shows 9 relevant improvements 🎉 but 152 relevant regressions 😿 to instruction counts.

  • Arithmetic mean of relevant regressions: 0.7%
  • Arithmetic mean of relevant improvements: -1.7%
  • Arithmetic mean of all relevant changes: 0.5%
  • Largest improvement in instruction counts: -3.8% on full builds of ripgrep opt
  • Largest regression in instruction counts: 3.3% on full builds of syn opt

If you disagree with this performance assessment, please file an issue in rust-lang/rustc-perf.

Next Steps: If you can justify the regressions found in this perf run, please indicate this with @rustbot label: +perf-regression-triaged along with sufficient written justification. If you cannot justify the regressions please open an issue or create a new PR that fixes the regressions, add a comment linking to the newly created issue or PR, and then add the perf-regression-triaged label to this PR.

@rustbot label: +perf-regression

@rustbot rustbot added the perf-regression Performance regression. label Mar 1, 2022
@erikdesjardins erikdesjardins deleted the revert-coldland branch March 1, 2022 17:42
TaKO8Ki added a commit to TaKO8Ki/rust that referenced this pull request Jun 27, 2023
…=nikic

Rebased: Mark drop calls in landing pads cold instead of noinline

I noticed that certain inlining optimizations were missing while staring at some compiled code output. I'd like to see this relanded, so I rebased the PR from ``@erikdesjardins`` (PR rust-lang#94823).

This PR reapplies rust-lang#92419, which was reverted in rust-lang#94402 due to rust-lang#94390.

Fixes rust-lang#46515, fixes rust-lang#87055.

Update: fixes rust-lang#97217.
bors added a commit to rust-lang-ci/rust that referenced this pull request Oct 2, 2023
…ikic

Rebased: Mark drop calls in landing pads cold instead of noinline

I noticed that certain inlining optimizations were missing while staring at some compiled code output. I'd like to see this relanded, so I rebased the PR from `@erikdesjardins` (PR rust-lang#94823).

This PR reapplies rust-lang#92419, which was reverted in rust-lang#94402 due to rust-lang#94390.

Fixes rust-lang#46515, fixes rust-lang#87055.

Update: fixes rust-lang#97217.
bors added a commit to rust-lang-ci/rust that referenced this pull request Oct 2, 2023
…ikic

Rebased: Mark drop calls in landing pads cold instead of noinline

I noticed that certain inlining optimizations were missing while staring at some compiled code output. I'd like to see this relanded, so I rebased the PR from `@erikdesjardins` (PR rust-lang#94823).

This PR reapplies rust-lang#92419, which was reverted in rust-lang#94402 due to rust-lang#94390.

Fixes rust-lang#46515, fixes rust-lang#87055.

Update: fixes rust-lang#97217.
antoyo pushed a commit to rust-lang/rustc_codegen_gcc that referenced this pull request Oct 8, 2023
Rebased: Mark drop calls in landing pads cold instead of noinline

I noticed that certain inlining optimizations were missing while staring at some compiled code output. I'd like to see this relanded, so I rebased the PR from `@erikdesjardins` (PR #94823).

This PR reapplies rust-lang/rust#92419, which was reverted in rust-lang/rust#94402 due to rust-lang/rust#94390.

Fixes rust-lang/rust#46515, fixes rust-lang/rust#87055.

Update: fixes #97217.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
merged-by-bors This PR was explicitly merged by bors. perf-regression Performance regression. S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

10 participants