Rollup of 5 pull requests #94935
Merged
Rollup of 5 pull requests #94935
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
…ature, r=Amanieu Stabilise `aarch64_target_feature` This PR stabilises `aarch64_target_feature` - see rust-lang#90620
…ata, r=wesleywiser Type params and assoc types have unit metadata if they are sized Extend the logic in `Pointee` projection to ensure that we can satisfy `<T as Pointee>::Metadata = ()` if `T: Sized`. cc: `@SimonSapin` and rust-lang#93959
…-party, r=flip1995,wesleywiser Improve `expect` impl and handle `#[expect(unfulfilled_lint_expectations)]` (RFC 2383) This PR updates unstable `ExpectationIds` in stashed diagnostics and adds some asserts to ensure that the stored expectations are really empty in the end. Additionally, it handles the `#[expect(unfulfilled_lint_expectations)]` case. According to the [Errors and lints docs](https://rustc-dev-guide.rust-lang.org/diagnostics.html#diagnostic-levels) the `error` level should only be used _"when the compiler detects a problem that makes it unable to compile the program"_. As this isn't the case with `#[expect(unfulfilled_lint_expectations)]` I decided to only create a warning. To avoid adding a new lint only for this case, I simply emit a `unfulfilled_lint_expectations` diagnostic with an additional note. --- r? `@wesleywiser` I'm requesting a review from you since you reviewed the previous PR rust-lang#87835. You are welcome to reassign it if you're busy 🙃 rfc: [RFC-2383](https://rust-lang.github.io/rfcs/2383-lint-reasons.html) tracking issue: rust-lang#85549 cc: `@flip1995` In case you're also interested in this :)
Fix remaining meta-variable expression TODOs As promised on rust-lang#93545. cc rust-lang#83527 cc `@mark-i-m` cc `@petrochenkov`
update miri Fixes rust-lang#94910 r? `@ghost`
rustbot
added
T-compiler
|
@bors r+ rollup=never p=5 |
|
📌 Commit 4753f24 has been approved by |
bors
added
the
S-waiting-on-bors
|
☀️ Test successful - checks-actions |
rust-highfive
added a commit
to rust-lang-nursery/rust-toolstate
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 15, 2022
Tested on commit rust-lang/rust@2184c7c. Direct link to PR: <rust-lang/rust#94935> 🎉 miri on windows: test-fail → test-pass (cc @eddyb @oli-obk @RalfJung). 🎉 miri on linux: test-fail → test-pass (cc @eddyb @oli-obk @RalfJung).
|
Finished benchmarking commit (2184c7c): comparison url. Summary: This benchmark run did not return any relevant results. If you disagree with this performance assessment, please file an issue in rust-lang/rustc-perf. @rustbot label: -perf-regression |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Successful merges:
aarch64_target_feature#90621 (Stabiliseaarch64_target_feature)expectimpl and handle#[expect(unfulfilled_lint_expectations)](RFC 2383) #94670 (Improveexpectimpl and handle#[expect(unfulfilled_lint_expectations)](RFC 2383))Failed merges:
r? @ghost
@rustbot modify labels: rollup
Create a similar rollup