Rollup of 6 pull requests #95287
Closed
Rollup of 6 pull requests #95287
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This enhances documentation with these details and extends the validator to check these requirements more thoroughly. As a part of this, we add a new `Deaggregated` phase, and rename other phases so that their names more naturally correspond to what they represent.
Before this fix, the debuginfo for the fields was generated from the struct defintion of Box<T>, but (at least at the moment) the compiler pretends that Box<T> is just a (fat) pointer, so the fields need to be `pointer` and `vtable` instead of `__0: Unique<T>` and `__1: Allocator`. This is meant as a temporary mitigation until we can make sure that simply treating Box as a regular struct in debuginfo does not cause too much breakage in the ecosystem.
RFC-2841: add codegen flag export symbols from executable Closes rust-lang#84161 r? ```@nikomatsakis``` ```@Mark-Simulacrum```
…mez,notriddle Fix `rustdoc` argument error This is the fix is corresponding to rust-lang#88756 mentored by ```@jyn514```
Fix ice when error reporting recursion errors Fixes: rust-lang#90319, rust-lang#92148, rust-lang#93955
Clarify which kinds of MIR are allowed during which phases. This enhances documentation with these details and extends the validator to check these requirements more thoroughly. Most of these conditions were already being checked. There was also some disagreement between the `MirPhase` docs and validator as to what it meant for the `body.phase` field to have a certain value. This PR resolves those disagreements in favor of the `MirPhase` docs (which is what the pass manager implemented), adjusting the validator accordingly. The result is now that the `DropLowering` phase begins with the end of the elaborate drops pass, and lasts until the beginning of the generator lowring pass. This doesn't feel entirely natural to me, but as long as it's documented accurately it should be ok. r? rust-lang/mir-opt
Try to evaluate in try unify and postpone resolution of constants that contain inference variables We want code like that in [`ui/const-generics/generic_const_exprs/eval-try-unify.rs`](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/compare/master...b-naber:eval-in-try-unify?expand=1#diff-8027038201cf07a6c96abf3cbf0b0f4fdd8a64ce6292435f01c8ed995b87fe9b) to compile. To do that we need to try to evaluate constants in `try_unify_abstract_consts`, this requires us to be more careful about what constants we try to resolve, specifically we cannot try to resolve constants that still contain inference variables. r? ``@lcnr``
…buginfo, r=wesleywiser debuginfo: Fix debuginfo for Box<T> where T is unsized. Before this fix, the debuginfo for the fields was generated from the struct defintion of Box<T>, but (at least at the moment) the compiler pretends that Box<T> is just a (fat) pointer, so the fields need to be `pointer` and `vtable` instead of `__0: Unique<T>` and `__1: Allocator`. This is meant as a temporary mitigation until we can make sure that simply treating Box as a regular struct in debuginfo does not cause too much breakage in the ecosystem. r? ``@wesleywiser``
rustbot
added
T-compiler
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Successful merges:
rustdocargument error #88831 (Fixrustdocargument error)Failed merges:
r? @ghost
@rustbot modify labels: rollup
Create a similar rollup