Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Less
NoDelim
#96421Less
NoDelim
#96421Changes from all commits
f0bbc78
6b367a0
a8e862c
9665da3
86f0117
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
There are no files selected for viewing
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Is this still necessary?
There's no longer a
DelimToken::NoDelim
at the top level.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
There's also a similar
// HACK
comment lower in the same function.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The "mismatched
None
delimiter at the top level" here refers totoken
, which comes from the iterator, not the frame. Indeed, the condition looks for a non-NoDelim
in the frame. So this change preserves the existing behaviour, as I understand it.More generally: there are three
HACK
comments in this function, and a comment at the top of the function referring to #67062. TheHACK
comments are on threeif
statements. I tried changing the bodies of those threeif
statements topanic!()
and the test suite passed. I then tried removing all threeif
statements and the test suite again passed.These
if
statements were added in #82608, with an explanation here. I don't know if (a) they never did anything useful, (b) they do something useful but we have no test coverage for them, or (c) something has changed in the meantime that means they are no longer necessary.I suggest we leave this change as is, and consider removing these hacks in a separate PR. That way if there are any regressions they'll be easier to deal with.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I have filed #96543 to remove the hacks.