Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fix typo in offset_from documentation #96639

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
May 6, 2022

Conversation

adpaco-aws
Copy link
Contributor

Small fix for what I think is a typo in the offset_from documentation.

Someone reading this may understand that the distance in bytes is obtained by dividing the distance by mem::size_of::<T>(), but here we just want to define "units of T" in terms of bytes (i.e., units of T == bytes / mem::size_of::<T>()).

@rust-highfive
Copy link
Collaborator

Hey! It looks like you've submitted a new PR for the library teams!

If this PR contains changes to any rust-lang/rust public library APIs then please comment with r? rust-lang/libs-api @rustbot label +T-libs-api -T-libs to request review from a libs-api team reviewer. If you're unsure where your change falls no worries, just leave it as is and the reviewer will take a look and make a decision to forward on if necessary.

Examples of T-libs-api changes:

  • Stabilizing library features
  • Introducing insta-stable changes such as new implementations of existing stable traits on existing stable types
  • Introducing new or changing existing unstable library APIs (excluding permanently unstable features / features without a tracking issue)
  • Changing public documentation in ways that create new stability guarantees
  • Changing observable runtime behavior of library APIs

@rustbot rustbot added the T-libs Relevant to the library team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. label May 2, 2022
@rust-highfive
Copy link
Collaborator

Thanks for the pull request, and welcome! The Rust team is excited to review your changes, and you should hear from @scottmcm (or someone else) soon.

Please see the contribution instructions for more information.

@rust-highfive rust-highfive added the S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. label May 2, 2022
@scottmcm
Copy link
Member

scottmcm commented May 6, 2022

Thanks! I agree this is clearer without the is.

@bors r+ rollup=always

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented May 6, 2022

📌 Commit 9b36a47 has been approved by scottmcm

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels May 6, 2022
bors added a commit to rust-lang-ci/rust that referenced this pull request May 6, 2022
…piler-errors

Rollup of 7 pull requests

Successful merges:

 - rust-lang#96174 (mark ptr-int-transmute test as no_run)
 - rust-lang#96639 (Fix typo in `offset_from` documentation)
 - rust-lang#96704 (Add rotation animation on settings button when loading)
 - rust-lang#96730 (Add a regression test for rust-lang#64173 and rust-lang#66152)
 - rust-lang#96741 (Improve settings loading strategy)
 - rust-lang#96744 (Implement [OsStr]::join)
 - rust-lang#96747 (Add `track_caller` to `DefId::expect_local()`)

Failed merges:

r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
@bors bors merged commit ef949da into rust-lang:master May 6, 2022
@rustbot rustbot added this to the 1.62.0 milestone May 6, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. T-libs Relevant to the library team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants