Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Rollup of 6 pull requests #97159

Merged
merged 14 commits into from
May 19, 2022
Merged

Rollup of 6 pull requests #97159

merged 14 commits into from
May 19, 2022

Conversation

JohnTitor
Copy link
Member

Successful merges:

Failed merges:

r? @ghost
@rustbot modify labels: rollup

Create a similar rollup

Mark-Simulacrum and others added 14 commits May 8, 2022 20:25
We currently upload approximately 166 GB/day into this bucket (estimate based on
duration of storage and total current size). My estimate is that this change
should decrease our costs (which are currently in credits) and is in the worst
case (if all objects are brought into hot storage due to unanticipated frequent
access) only going to add an additional ~$4 to the monthly bill. If access is
rare (as expected) to most objects then we expect to save approximately
~$350/month (after this change takes full effect in ~168 days).
There is no reason it needs to be lazily computed at the first iteration
of the cgu loop.
This reduces the complexity of this code a lot
…u-se"

This reverts commit ddb7fbe, reversing
changes made to baaa3b6.
…-ci, r=pietroalbini

Switch CI bucket uploads to intelligent tiering

We currently upload approximately 166 GB/day into this bucket (estimate based on
duration of storage and total current size). My estimate is that this change
should decrease our costs (which are currently in credits) and is in the worst
case (if all objects are brought into hot storage due to unanticipated frequent
access) only going to add an additional ~$4 to the monthly bill. If access is
rare (as expected) to most objects then we expect to save approximately
~$350/month (after this change takes full effect in ~168 days).

r? ``@pietroalbini``
…mpiler-errors

Couple of refactorings to cg_ssa::base::codegen_crate

This makes the code simpler and easier to read.
…u-se

Revert "Auto merge of rust-lang#96441 - ChrisDenton:sync-pipes, r=m-ou-se"

This reverts commit ddb7fbe.

Partially addresses rust-lang#97124, but not marking as fixed as we're still pending on a beta backport (for 1.62, which is happening in rust-lang#97088).

r? ``@m-ou-se`` ``@ChrisDenton``
…neration, r=notriddle

Move some settings DOM generation out of JS

The first commit reduce the JS size a bit by moving some DOM content generation into the HTML file directly.

The second commit is an update of the `browser-ui-test` version which improves `wait-for-*` command (if the element doesn't exist, it'll wait for it instead of failing).

r? ``@notriddle``
Update cargo

3 commits in 3f052d8eed98c6a24f8b332fb2e6e6249d12d8c1..a4c1cd0eb6b18082a7e693f5a665548fe1534be4
2022-05-12 15:19:04 +0000 to 2022-05-18 01:52:07 +0000
- Add notes about pre-stabilization to contributor unstable docs (rust-lang/cargo#10675)
- reference: Update syntax supported by `rustc-link-lib` (rust-lang/cargo#10674)
- Correct the release dates for 1.61 and 1.62 (rust-lang/cargo#10665)
@rustbot rustbot added T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. T-libs Relevant to the library team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. T-rustdoc Relevant to the rustdoc team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. rollup A PR which is a rollup labels May 18, 2022
@JohnTitor
Copy link
Member Author

@bors r+ p=6 rollup=never

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented May 18, 2022

📌 Commit 9babb1c has been approved by JohnTitor

@bors bors added the S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. label May 18, 2022
@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented May 19, 2022

⌛ Testing commit 9babb1c with merge e6327bc...

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented May 19, 2022

☀️ Test successful - checks-actions
Approved by: JohnTitor
Pushing e6327bc to master...

@bors bors added the merged-by-bors This PR was explicitly merged by bors. label May 19, 2022
@bors bors merged commit e6327bc into rust-lang:master May 19, 2022
@rustbot rustbot added this to the 1.63.0 milestone May 19, 2022
@rust-timer
Copy link
Collaborator

Finished benchmarking commit (e6327bc): comparison url.

Summary: This benchmark run did not return any relevant results.

If you disagree with this performance assessment, please file an issue in rust-lang/rustc-perf.

@rustbot label: -perf-regression

@JohnTitor JohnTitor deleted the rollup-ibl51vw branch May 19, 2022 08:28
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
merged-by-bors This PR was explicitly merged by bors. rollup A PR which is a rollup S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. T-libs Relevant to the library team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. T-rustdoc Relevant to the rustdoc team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

8 participants