Rollup of 5 pull requests #97835
Merged
Rollup of 5 pull requests #97835
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
When constructing a MIR from a THIR field expression, introduce an additional downcast projection before accessing a field of an enum. When rebasing a place builder on top of a captured place, account for the fact that a single HIR enum field projection corresponds to two MIR projection elements: a downcast element and a field element.
The docs were saying something about "statically initializing" the mutex, and it's not clear what this means. Remove that part to avoid confusion.
Co-authored-by: Weiyi Wang <wwylele@gmail.com>
Namely, the two functions `from_ptr` and `from_bytes_with_nul_unchecked`. Before, this functions didn't state the requirements clearly enough, and I was not immediately able to find them like for other functions. This doesn't change the content of the docs, but simply rewords them for clarity.
… r=RalfJung Improve the safety docs for `CStr` Namely, the two functions `from_ptr` and `from_bytes_with_nul_unchecked`. Before, these functions didn't state the requirements clearly enough, and I was not immediately able to find them like for other functions. This doesn't change the content of the docs, but simply rewords them for clarity. note: I'm not entirely sure about the '`ptr` must be valid for reads of `u8`.', there might be room for improvement for this (and maybe for the other docs as well 😄)
…-aman Fix precise field capture of univariant enums When constructing a MIR from a THIR field expression, introduce an additional downcast projection before accessing a field of an enum. When rebasing a place builder on top of a captured place, account for the fact that a single HIR enum field projection corresponds to two MIR projection elements: a downcast element and a field element. Fixes rust-lang#95271. Fixes rust-lang#96299. Fixes rust-lang#96512. Fixes rust-lang#97378. r? ``@nikomatsakis`` ``@arora-aman``
…=lnicola ⬆️ rust-analyzer r? ``@ghost``
Remove confusing sentence from `Mutex` docs The docs were saying something about "statically initializing" the mutex, and it's not clear what this means. Remove that part to avoid confusion.
…fo, r=Dylan-DPC Add more information for rustdoc-gui tests It was missing `--no-sandbox` in the `--help` message and the README was a bit outdated. cc `@jsha` (I recall you asking some questions about passing arguments to the rustdoc gui tester so here it). r? `@notriddle`
rustbot
added
T-compiler
|
@bors r+ rollup=never p=5 |
|
📌 Commit 4851ec7 has been approved by |
bors
added
the
S-waiting-on-bors
|
☀️ Test successful - checks-actions |
|
Finished benchmarking commit (5435ed6): comparison url. Instruction countThis benchmark run did not return any relevant results for this metric. Max RSS (memory usage)Results
CyclesResults
If you disagree with this performance assessment, please file an issue in rust-lang/rustc-perf. @rustbot label: -perf-regression Footnotes |
This was referenced Nov 17, 2023
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Successful merges:
CStr#95948 (Improve the safety docs forCStr)Mutexdocs #97821 (Remove confusing sentence fromMutexdocs)Failed merges:
r? @ghost
@rustbot modify labels: rollup
Create a similar rollup