Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

hexagon: adapt test for upstream output changes #97838

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jun 9, 2022
Merged

hexagon: adapt test for upstream output changes #97838

Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
1 commit
Select commit
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
6 changes: 3 additions & 3 deletions src/test/assembly/asm/hexagon-types.rs
View file
Open in desktop
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -73,7 +73,7 @@ macro_rules! check_reg {

// CHECK-LABEL: sym_static:
// CHECK: InlineAsm Start
// CHECK: r0 = #extern_static
// CHECK: r0 = {{#+}}extern_static
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The # versus ## syntax refers to whether the assembler should force an immediate-extender word prior to this word in the encoding.

This test change is appropriate, but I am curious about its origin so I will investigate. Additional extender words can result in increased code size. This test isn't intended to focus on this aspect of the emitted instructions, so I think it's appropriate as-is.

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Could it be that the assembler is reserving space for a full-size immediate that will be filled in by the linker later?

// CHECK: InlineAsm End
#[no_mangle]
pub unsafe fn sym_static() {
Expand All @@ -88,7 +88,7 @@ pub unsafe fn sym_static() {

// CHECK-LABEL: sym_fn:
// CHECK: InlineAsm Start
// CHECK: r0 = #extern_func
// CHECK: r0 = {{#+}}extern_func
// CHECK: InlineAsm End
#[no_mangle]
pub unsafe fn sym_fn() {
Expand All @@ -108,7 +108,7 @@ pub unsafe fn sym_fn() {
// CHECK: InlineAsm Start
// CHECK: {
// CHECK: r{{[0-9]+}} = r0
// CHECK: memw(r1) = r{{[0-9]+}}
// CHECK: memw(r1{{(\+#0)?}}) = r{{[0-9]+}}
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This offset is implied in the baseline and it would appear that the code emitted may have changed slightly.

This test change is appropriate.

// CHECK: }
// CHECK: InlineAsm End
#[no_mangle]
Expand Down