-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 12.8k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Add gamma function to f32 and f64 #99747
Conversation
Thanks for the pull request, and welcome! The Rust team is excited to review your changes, and you should hear from @m-ou-se (or someone else) soon. Please see the contribution instructions for more information. |
Hey! It looks like you've submitted a new PR for the library teams! If this PR contains changes to any Examples of
|
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
LGTM. Please file a tracking issue, then r=me. |
Thanks @joshtriplett, tracking issue added. |
@bors r+ rollup |
Add gamma function to f32 and f64 Adds the [gamma function](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gamma_function) to `f32` and `f64` (`tgamma` and `tgammaf` from C). Refs: - rust-lang/rfcs#864 - rust-lang#18271
failed in rollup |
@bors r- |
library/std/src/f32/tests.rs
Outdated
@@ -550,6 +550,21 @@ fn test_atanh() { | |||
assert_approx_eq!((-0.5f32).atanh(), -0.54930614433405484569762261846126285f32); | |||
} | |||
|
|||
#[test] | |||
fn test_gamma() { | |||
assert_eq!(0.0f32.gamma(), f32::INFINITY); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This test causes compile time errors on platforms like x86_64-fortanix-unknown-sgx
and probably others:
12:04:56 = note: rust-lld: error: undefined symbol: tgammaf
12:04:56 >>> referenced by std.143fe29c-cgu.2
12:04:56 >>> /home/jenkins/workspace/rust-sgx-ci/rust/build/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/stage1-std/x86_64-fortanix-unknown-sgx/release/deps/std-e08c880d8c834560.std.143fe29c-cgu.2.rcgu.o:(std::f32::tests::test_gamma::he9b80e8a0cc72b6a)
12:04:56 >>> referenced by std.143fe29c-cgu.2
12:04:56 >>> /home/jenkins/workspace/rust-sgx-ci/rust/build/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/stage1-std/x86_64-fortanix-unknown-sgx/release/deps/std-e08c880d8c834560.std.143fe29c-cgu.2.rcgu.o:(std::f32::tests::test_gamma::he9b80e8a0cc72b6a)
12:04:56 >>> referenced by std.143fe29c-cgu.2
12:04:56 >>> /home/jenkins/workspace/rust-sgx-ci/rust/build/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/stage1-std/x86_64-fortanix-unknown-sgx/release/deps/std-e08c880d8c834560.std.143fe29c-cgu.2.rcgu.o:(std::f32::tests::test_gamma::he9b80e8a0cc72b6a)
12:04:56 >>> referenced 6 more times
12:04:56
12:04:56 rust-lld: error: undefined symbol: tgamma
12:04:56 >>> referenced by std.143fe29c-cgu.3
12:04:56 >>> /home/jenkins/workspace/rust-sgx-ci/rust/build/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/stage1-std/x86_64-fortanix-unknown-sgx/release/deps/std-e08c880d8c834560.std.143fe29c-cgu.3.rcgu.o:(std::f64::tests::test_gamma::hff115a05914e5bdc)
12:04:56 >>> referenced by std.143fe29c-cgu.3
12:04:56 >>> /home/jenkins/workspace/rust-sgx-ci/rust/build/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/stage1-std/x86_64-fortanix-unknown-sgx/release/deps/std-e08c880d8c834560.std.143fe29c-cgu.3.rcgu.o:(std::f64::tests::test_gamma::hff115a05914e5bdc)
12:04:56 >>> referenced by std.143fe29c-cgu.3
12:04:56 >>> /home/jenkins/workspace/rust-sgx-ci/rust/build/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/stage1-std/x86_64-fortanix-unknown-sgx/release/deps/std-e08c880d8c834560.std.143fe29c-cgu.3.rcgu.o:(std::f64::tests::test_gamma::hff115a05914e5bdc)
12:04:56 >>> referenced 6 more times
12:04:56
12:04:56
12:04:56 error: could not compile `std` due to previous error
Looking into it, these tgamma
and tgammaf
symbols exists, but are not exported from the compiler-builtins
crate. These should probably be added here.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thanks @raoulstrackx! Submitted a PR there: rust-lang/compiler-builtins#482
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Great! Thanks @ankane !
library/std/src/f64/tests.rs
Outdated
@@ -535,6 +535,21 @@ fn test_atanh() { | |||
assert_approx_eq!((-0.5f64).atanh(), -0.54930614433405484569762261846126285f64); | |||
} | |||
|
|||
#[test] | |||
fn test_gamma() { | |||
assert_eq!(0.0f64.gamma(), f64::INFINITY); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Causes similar issues as above
I think this PR should never be rolled up because it's going to fail on more targets like @bors rollup=never |
@mati865: 🔑 Insufficient privileges: not in try users |
@bors rollup=never |
@mati865 I was expecting that these symbols were being provided by compiler-builtins fallbacks on all platforms. We do need fallbacks for platforms that don't have these. |
@joshtriplett I'm away until next week but mingw-w64 seems to provide own implementation when using MSVCRT but it returns wrong results for certain values. This issue has been fixed 3 years ago but Rust uses 5 years old release. |
Just bumped |
☔ The latest upstream changes (presumably #100380) made this pull request unmergeable. Please resolve the merge conflicts. |
⌛ Testing commit 793e952d9beb8ed40ecbfa188e37882dfdb15555 with merge ee51e45123e931937c445a123b67d24d3e3cd4fa... |
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
💔 Test failed - checks-actions |
r? @workingjubilee |
Bumped @rustbot ready |
I hope we can solve the underlying problem there, soon. ( And that it doesn't crop up again for this PR... ) @bors r+ |
☀️ Test successful - checks-actions |
Thanks everyone for helping with this! |
Finished benchmarking commit (8838c73): comparison URL. Overall result: ❌✅ regressions and improvements - no action needed@rustbot label: -perf-regression Instruction countThis is a highly reliable metric that was used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.
Max RSS (memory usage)ResultsThis is a less reliable metric that may be of interest but was not used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.
CyclesThis benchmark run did not return any relevant results for this metric. Binary sizeThis benchmark run did not return any relevant results for this metric. Bootstrap: 633.338s -> 632.915s (-0.07%) |
unsafe { cmath::tgammaf(self) } | ||
} | ||
|
||
/// Returns the natural logarithm of the gamma function. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This is wrong, it returns the natural log of the absolute value of the gamma function.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
#[test]
fn test_ln_gamma() {
assert_approx_eq!(1.0f64.ln_gamma().0, 0.0f64);
assert_eq!(1.0f64.ln_gamma().1, 1);
assert_approx_eq!(2.0f64.ln_gamma().0, 0.0f64);
assert_eq!(2.0f64.ln_gamma().1, 1);
assert_approx_eq!(3.0f64.ln_gamma().0, 2.0f64.ln());
assert_eq!(3.0f64.ln_gamma().1, 1);
assert_approx_eq!((-0.5f64).ln_gamma().0, (2.0 * consts::PI.sqrt()).ln());
assert_eq!((-0.5f64).ln_gamma().1, -1);
}
? am I just missing something, if so why does the final test case pass...
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Γ(-0.5f64)
is negative, its natural log should be undefined
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
...well, it sounds obvious now that you've said it, so...!
#114754
Adds the gamma function to
f32
andf64
(tgamma
andtgammaf
from C).Refs: