Clean up 'Contributing to Rust - Pull Requests' #870
Conversation
|
|
||
| [rust-highfive]: https://github.com/rust-highfive | ||
| [steveklabnik]: https://github.com/steveklabnik | ||
| [@bors]: https://github.com/bors | ||
| [merge-queue]: https://buildbot2.rust-lang.org/homu/queue/rust | ||
|
|
||
| Speaking of tests, Rust has a comprehensive test suite. More information about | ||
| it can be found [here][rctd]. | ||
| ### Opening a PR |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Hmm, I think I'd prefer for this to be a separate page to avoid making this one too long. But there's already a lot of sections, so maybe splitting them all up should be a separate PR?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I think I could do that in a separate PR
| Rust follows a _no merge-commit policy_, meaning, when you encounter merge | ||
| conflicts you are expected to always rebase instead of merging. E.g. always use | ||
| rebase when bringing the latest changes from the master branch to your feature | ||
| branch. Also, please make sure that fixup commits are squashed into other | ||
| related commits with meaningful commit messages. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Once someone writes up #850, this should link there. But no need to solve two issues at once ;)
|
I think it's not discoverable enough still ... I think to mark that as closed we should split up the contributing page into multiple smaller ones, then I'd be happy enough. As it is there's a lot of text to wade through to find what you're looking for. |
|
This is definitely much better than before though! |
|
Changed it to not close #866. |
Co-authored-by: Joshua Nelson <joshua@yottadb.com>
jyn514
added
the
waiting-on-review
| @@ -116,32 +90,77 @@ make a documentation change, add | |||
| to the end of the pull request description, and [@rust-highfive][rust-highfive] will assign | |||
| [@steveklabnik][steveklabnik] instead of a random person. This is entirely optional. | |||
|
|
|||
| In addition to being reviewed by a human, pull requests are automatically tested | |||
| thanks to continuous integration (CI). Basically, every time you open and update | |||
| a pull request, CI builds the compiler and tests it against the | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
| a pull request, CI builds the compiler and tests it against the | |
| a PR, CI builds the compiler and tests it against the |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
This avoids having to decide between pull request and Pull Request
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I don't think Pull Request vs pull request is a problem however
Also helps with #866.