Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Enable shellcheck and fold Travis log #1776

Merged
merged 5 commits into from
Apr 22, 2019
Merged

Conversation

tesuji
Copy link
Contributor

@tesuji tesuji commented Apr 19, 2019

Split from #1760
r? @kinnison

@tesuji tesuji force-pushed the shellcheck branch 8 times, most recently from 084e195 to 151d82d Compare April 21, 2019 16:57
Copy link
Contributor

@kinnison kinnison left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Apart from the worry about the trusty -> xenial jump, I'm okay with this. What's the impact of that jump in terms of supporting users?

.travis.yml Show resolved Hide resolved
.travis.yml Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@kinnison
Copy link
Contributor

I'm pretty much prepared to merge this, except I think I'd like it if the depth bit was removed rather than suggesting we'd be happy to unremove it once the bug is fixed. I'd much prefer to always have full git history for the CI in case we add further diagnostics.

@tesuji
Copy link
Contributor Author

tesuji commented Apr 22, 2019

I removed the depth flag. Now Travis will clone full depth when building.

Copy link
Contributor

@kinnison kinnison left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@kinnison kinnison merged commit 06fd7ef into rust-lang:master Apr 22, 2019
@tesuji tesuji deleted the shellcheck branch April 22, 2019 12:27
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants