-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 119
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
One-way encryption, ad-hoc encryption for users, without private keys #9
Comments
@psionic-k One-way encryption works fine, just don't include your public key in |
The way to accomplish a "blind edit" is to first |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
The CLI instructions show an edit of an existing secret and having access to private keys necessary to do so. I may want to set up a situation where the ssh private key is unrecoverable by the user who needs to encrypt secrets. In such case, a one-way encryption workflow is necessary. The ad-hoc pathway to get encrypted secrets into the store, if there is one, is not documented on the README and needs to be pulled out of code. A user who can re-encrypt secrets can always control the contents of secrets without needing to access them, a blind edit.
I'm looking into the management of decryption keys still.
This issue is motivated by dotfiles use cases with multiple users, not the root user case.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: