[improvement] Small cache size #1775
Conversation
(2 ^ 8) = (2 XOR 8) = 10. Was it intended to be 256?
📝 WalkthroughWalkthroughThe pull request introduces a minor configuration change in the Changes
The change is straightforward and does not impact the overall logic or behavior of the code beyond the cache size configuration. Tip CodeRabbit's docstrings feature is now available as part of our Early Access Program! Simply use the command Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
service/intel/filterlists/database.go(1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (1)
service/intel/filterlists/database.go (1)
53-53: Verify cache size adequacy
The cache size of 256 seems small considering the batch processing size of 1000 records. Let's verify if this cache size is adequate for the typical workload.
| @@ -50,7 +50,7 @@ var ( | |||
| var cache = database.NewInterface(&database.Options{ | |||
| Local: true, | |||
| Internal: true, | |||
| CacheSize: 2 ^ 8, | |||
| CacheSize: 256, | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Fix critical bug: Correct cache size from XOR to power operation
The change from 2 ^ 8 to 256 fixes a critical bug where the XOR operator (^) was mistakenly used instead of power operation, resulting in a cache size of 10 instead of 256 (2⁸).
Consider adding a constant to make the intention clear:
+const (
+ // defaultCacheSize is 2⁸, providing reasonable caching for filter list entries
+ defaultCacheSize = 256
+)
var cache = database.NewInterface(&database.Options{
Local: true,
Internal: true,
- CacheSize: 256,
+ CacheSize: defaultCacheSize,
})Committable suggestion skipped: line range outside the PR's diff.
(2 ^ 8) = (2 XOR 8) = 10.
Was it intended to be 256?
Summary by CodeRabbit