-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 487
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
cohomology of simplicial complexes with finite coefficients as modules over steenrod algebras #6103
Comments
5 tasks
vbraun
pushed a commit
to vbraun/sage
that referenced
this issue
Oct 1, 2023
…gebra Mod 2 (co)homology as a module over the Steenrod algebra <!-- ^^^^^ Please provide a concise, informative and self-explanatory title. Don't put issue numbers in there, do this in the PR body below. For example, instead of "Fixes sagemath#1234" use "Introduce new method to calculate 1+1" --> <!-- Describe your changes here in detail --> Implement: - vector space duality for (co)homology of cell complexes with field coefficients, switching between homology and cohomology - Steenrod operations on homology and cohomology, acting from the left and from the right The Steenrod operation "Sq(i)" was already implemented for cohomology rings, raising an error if it was used with a base field other than GF(2). Now there is a new class, `CohomologyRing_mod2`, which should only be used with that base field, and the `Sq` method is attached to Elements of that new class. Using Steenrod operations is more transparent: in addition to doing `x.Sq(i)`, users can do `Sq(i) * x` or `x * Sq(i)`, or indeed `a * x` or `x * a` for any element `a` of `SteenrodAlgebra(2)`. (The elements `Sq(i)` generate the Steenrod algebra, but they do not constitute a full list of the elements.) This fixes sagemath#6103. <!-- Why is this change required? What problem does it solve? --> <!-- If this PR resolves an open issue, please link to it here. For example "Fixes sagemath#12345". --> <!-- If your change requires a documentation PR, please link it appropriately. --> ### 📝 Checklist <!-- Put an `x` in all the boxes that apply. --> <!-- If your change requires a documentation PR, please link it appropriately --> <!-- If you're unsure about any of these, don't hesitate to ask. We're here to help! --> <!-- Feel free to remove irrelevant items. --> - [X] The title is concise, informative, and self-explanatory. - [X] The description explains in detail what this PR is about. - [X] I have linked a relevant issue or discussion. - [X] I have created tests covering the changes. - [X] I have updated the documentation accordingly. ### ⌛ Dependencies <!-- List all open PRs that this PR logically depends on - sagemath#12345: short description why this is a dependency - sagemath#34567: ... --> <!-- If you're unsure about any of these, don't hesitate to ask. We're here to help! --> URL: sagemath#36310 Reported by: John H. Palmieri Reviewer(s): John H. Palmieri, Travis Scrimshaw
vbraun
pushed a commit
that referenced
this issue
Oct 8, 2023
Mod 2 (co)homology as a module over the Steenrod algebra <!-- ^^^^^ Please provide a concise, informative and self-explanatory title. Don't put issue numbers in there, do this in the PR body below. For example, instead of "Fixes #1234" use "Introduce new method to calculate 1+1" --> <!-- Describe your changes here in detail --> Implement: - vector space duality for (co)homology of cell complexes with field coefficients, switching between homology and cohomology - Steenrod operations on homology and cohomology, acting from the left and from the right The Steenrod operation "Sq(i)" was already implemented for cohomology rings, raising an error if it was used with a base field other than GF(2). Now there is a new class, `CohomologyRing_mod2`, which should only be used with that base field, and the `Sq` method is attached to Elements of that new class. Using Steenrod operations is more transparent: in addition to doing `x.Sq(i)`, users can do `Sq(i) * x` or `x * Sq(i)`, or indeed `a * x` or `x * a` for any element `a` of `SteenrodAlgebra(2)`. (The elements `Sq(i)` generate the Steenrod algebra, but they do not constitute a full list of the elements.) This fixes #6103. <!-- Why is this change required? What problem does it solve? --> <!-- If this PR resolves an open issue, please link to it here. For example "Fixes #12345". --> <!-- If your change requires a documentation PR, please link it appropriately. --> ### 📝 Checklist <!-- Put an `x` in all the boxes that apply. --> <!-- If your change requires a documentation PR, please link it appropriately --> <!-- If you're unsure about any of these, don't hesitate to ask. We're here to help! --> <!-- Feel free to remove irrelevant items. --> - [X] The title is concise, informative, and self-explanatory. - [X] The description explains in detail what this PR is about. - [X] I have linked a relevant issue or discussion. - [X] I have created tests covering the changes. - [X] I have updated the documentation accordingly. ### ⌛ Dependencies <!-- List all open PRs that this PR logically depends on - #12345: short description why this is a dependency - #34567: ... --> <!-- If you're unsure about any of these, don't hesitate to ask. We're here to help! --> URL: #36310 Reported by: John H. Palmieri Reviewer(s): John H. Palmieri, Travis Scrimshaw
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Implement functionality in sage to return the ZZ-graded cohomology with GF(p)-coefficients of an arbitrary simplicial complex as a module over the Steenrod algebra A(p).
This will depend on #6099, #6100, #6101, and #5882. The methodolgy will be similar to that implemented in the ticket #6102.
CC: @jhpalmieri @antieau
Component: algebraic topology
Issue created by migration from https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/6103
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: