Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

cohomology of simplicial complexes with finite coefficients as modules over steenrod algebras #6103

Closed
antieau mannequin opened this issue May 21, 2009 · 1 comment · Fixed by #36310
Closed

cohomology of simplicial complexes with finite coefficients as modules over steenrod algebras #6103

antieau mannequin opened this issue May 21, 2009 · 1 comment · Fixed by #36310

Comments

@antieau
Copy link
Mannequin

antieau mannequin commented May 21, 2009

Implement functionality in sage to return the ZZ-graded cohomology with GF(p)-coefficients of an arbitrary simplicial complex as a module over the Steenrod algebra A(p).

This will depend on #6099, #6100, #6101, and #5882. The methodolgy will be similar to that implemented in the ticket #6102.

CC: @jhpalmieri @antieau

Component: algebraic topology

Issue created by migration from https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/6103

@jhpalmieri
Copy link
Member

Note that #36310 only does that at the prime 2, not in general. Still good enough (IMHO) to close this, if #36310 is merged.

vbraun pushed a commit to vbraun/sage that referenced this issue Oct 1, 2023
…gebra

    
Mod 2 (co)homology as a module over the Steenrod algebra

<!-- ^^^^^
Please provide a concise, informative and self-explanatory title.
Don't put issue numbers in there, do this in the PR body below.
For example, instead of "Fixes sagemath#1234" use "Introduce new method to
calculate 1+1"
-->
<!-- Describe your changes here in detail -->

Implement:

- vector space duality for (co)homology of cell complexes with field
coefficients, switching between homology and cohomology
- Steenrod operations on homology and cohomology, acting from the left
and from the right

The Steenrod operation "Sq(i)" was already implemented for cohomology
rings, raising an error if it was used with a base field other than
GF(2). Now there is a new class, `CohomologyRing_mod2`, which should
only be used with that base field, and the `Sq` method is attached to
Elements of that new class.

Using Steenrod operations is more transparent: in addition to doing
`x.Sq(i)`, users can do `Sq(i) * x` or `x * Sq(i)`, or indeed `a * x` or
`x * a` for any element `a` of `SteenrodAlgebra(2)`. (The elements
`Sq(i)` generate the Steenrod algebra, but they do not constitute a full
list of the elements.)

This fixes sagemath#6103.

<!-- Why is this change required? What problem does it solve? -->
<!-- If this PR resolves an open issue, please link to it here. For
example "Fixes sagemath#12345". -->
<!-- If your change requires a documentation PR, please link it
appropriately. -->

### 📝 Checklist

<!-- Put an `x` in all the boxes that apply. -->
<!-- If your change requires a documentation PR, please link it
appropriately -->
<!-- If you're unsure about any of these, don't hesitate to ask. We're
here to help! -->
<!-- Feel free to remove irrelevant items. -->

- [X] The title is concise, informative, and self-explanatory.
- [X] The description explains in detail what this PR is about.
- [X] I have linked a relevant issue or discussion.
- [X] I have created tests covering the changes.
- [X] I have updated the documentation accordingly.

### ⌛ Dependencies

<!-- List all open PRs that this PR logically depends on
- sagemath#12345: short description why this is a dependency
- sagemath#34567: ...
-->

<!-- If you're unsure about any of these, don't hesitate to ask. We're
here to help! -->
    
URL: sagemath#36310
Reported by: John H. Palmieri
Reviewer(s): John H. Palmieri, Travis Scrimshaw
vbraun pushed a commit that referenced this issue Oct 8, 2023
    
Mod 2 (co)homology as a module over the Steenrod algebra

<!-- ^^^^^
Please provide a concise, informative and self-explanatory title.
Don't put issue numbers in there, do this in the PR body below.
For example, instead of "Fixes #1234" use "Introduce new method to
calculate 1+1"
-->
<!-- Describe your changes here in detail -->

Implement:

- vector space duality for (co)homology of cell complexes with field
coefficients, switching between homology and cohomology
- Steenrod operations on homology and cohomology, acting from the left
and from the right

The Steenrod operation "Sq(i)" was already implemented for cohomology
rings, raising an error if it was used with a base field other than
GF(2). Now there is a new class, `CohomologyRing_mod2`, which should
only be used with that base field, and the `Sq` method is attached to
Elements of that new class.

Using Steenrod operations is more transparent: in addition to doing
`x.Sq(i)`, users can do `Sq(i) * x` or `x * Sq(i)`, or indeed `a * x` or
`x * a` for any element `a` of `SteenrodAlgebra(2)`. (The elements
`Sq(i)` generate the Steenrod algebra, but they do not constitute a full
list of the elements.)

This fixes #6103.

<!-- Why is this change required? What problem does it solve? -->
<!-- If this PR resolves an open issue, please link to it here. For
example "Fixes #12345". -->
<!-- If your change requires a documentation PR, please link it
appropriately. -->

### 📝 Checklist

<!-- Put an `x` in all the boxes that apply. -->
<!-- If your change requires a documentation PR, please link it
appropriately -->
<!-- If you're unsure about any of these, don't hesitate to ask. We're
here to help! -->
<!-- Feel free to remove irrelevant items. -->

- [X] The title is concise, informative, and self-explanatory.
- [X] The description explains in detail what this PR is about.
- [X] I have linked a relevant issue or discussion.
- [X] I have created tests covering the changes.
- [X] I have updated the documentation accordingly.

### ⌛ Dependencies

<!-- List all open PRs that this PR logically depends on
- #12345: short description why this is a dependency
- #34567: ...
-->

<!-- If you're unsure about any of these, don't hesitate to ask. We're
here to help! -->
    
URL: #36310
Reported by: John H. Palmieri
Reviewer(s): John H. Palmieri, Travis Scrimshaw
@mkoeppe mkoeppe added this to the sage-10.2 milestone Oct 8, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

2 participants