Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Integer and Rational classes need nth_root and exact_power functions #8

Closed
sagetrac-dmharvey mannequin opened this issue Sep 12, 2006 · 1 comment
Closed

Integer and Rational classes need nth_root and exact_power functions #8

sagetrac-dmharvey mannequin opened this issue Sep 12, 2006 · 1 comment

Comments

@sagetrac-dmharvey
Copy link
Mannequin

sagetrac-dmharvey mannequin commented Sep 12, 2006

It would be useful for Integer and Rational classes to have:

(1) nth_root: this would wrap GMP's mpz_root.
(2) exact_power: would accept a rational number as an index, and work out which root to take. For example

(-8/27).exact_power(2/3) == 4/9

I had to take an exact 6th root of a rational in some code the other day and it was painful going via real numbers, worrying about bits of precision and all that.

Component: basic arithmetic

Issue created by migration from https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/8

@sagetrac-dmharvey
Copy link
Mannequin Author

sagetrac-dmharvey mannequin commented Sep 16, 2006

comment:1

Fixed.

Fri Sep 15 17:19:10 PDT 2006 dmharvey@math.harvard.edu

  • Rational.nth_root() -- adds Rational nth root method

Fri Sep 15 17:18:20 PDT 2006 dmharvey@math.harvard.edu

  • Integer.nth_root() -- adds nth root method to Integer (wraps GMP mpz_root)

@sagetrac-dmharvey sagetrac-dmharvey mannequin closed this as completed Sep 16, 2006
vbraun pushed a commit that referenced this issue Mar 26, 2023
    
### 📚 Description

Trac branch `u/gh-collares/gap-gc` from #34701, now migrated to GitHub.
Currently based atop #35093; will rebase once that is merged.

The rest of the description below is copied from #34701:

A refactor in #27946 introduced "unprotected" (not surrounded by
`GAP_Enter`/`GAP_Leave`) `GAP_ValueGlobalVariable` calls. I believe this
might be a GC hazard, because after updating to GAP 4.12.1 I started
seeing aarch64 crashes on NixOS infrastructure such as:

```
#0  0x0000fffff79740e8 in wait4 ()
#1  0x0000fffff5dc6b78 in print_enhanced_backtrace ()
#2  0x0000fffff5dc8190 in sigdie ()
#3  0x0000fffff5dcb1c0 in cysigs_signal_handler ()
#4  0x0000fffff7ffb7cc in __kernel_rt_sigreturn ()
#5  0x0000ffff99a0bf28 in ConvString ()
#6  0x0000000000000000 in ?? ()
#7  0x0000000000000000 in ?? ()
#8  0x0000000000000000 in ?? ()
#9  0x0000ffff99989930 in Pr ()
#10 0x0000ffff9998aa18 in CloseOutput ()
#11 0x0000ffff99884828 in capture_stdout () at /build/sage-
src-9.7/pkgs/sagemath-standard/sage/libs/gap/element.pyx:154
...
```
I also see cases where `capture_stdout` throws errors such as
`sage.libs.gap.util.GAPError: Error, Length: <list> must be a list (not
the integer 255)` and then crashes. Both types of errors are fixed by
this ticket.

Note that I am nesting `GAP_Enter`/`GAP_Leave` calls because I didn't
remove the preexisting calls inside `capture_stdout`. That's because I
feared removing the innermost calls might create a new footgun (and I
believe nested `GAP_Enter`/`GAP_Leave` calls are explicitly supported),
but removing them should cause no problem. Removing them might even be
preferable for performance reasons, I don't know.

Fixes #34701

### 📝 Checklist

<!-- Put an `x` in all the boxes that apply. -->
<!-- If your change requires a documentation PR, please link it
appropriately -->
<!-- If you're unsure about any of these, don't hesitate to ask. We're
here to help! -->

- [x] I have made sure that the title is self-explanatory and the
description concisely explains the PR.
- [x] I have linked an issue or discussion.
- [ ] I have created tests covering the changes.
- [ ] I have updated the documentation accordingly.

### ⌛ Dependencies
<!-- List all open pull requests that this PR logically depends on -->
<!--
- #xyz: short description why this is a dependency
- #abc: ...
-->
- #35093: GAP 4.12.2 upgrade, which touches the same function and should
land first.
    
URL: #35114
Reported by: Mauricio Collares
Reviewer(s): Dima Pasechnik
jsantillan3 added a commit to jsantillan3/sage that referenced this issue Jul 28, 2023
…block_matrix_form, summand_matrices (sagemath#8)

* wip onesum

* wip onesum2

* wip onesum test

* onesum node example

* fixed names of .summand_matrices() and .block_matrix_form,
....: and added examples to ._children()

* style fixes

---------

Co-authored-by: J S <javier@javiers-mbp.mynetworksettings.com>
Co-authored-by: J S <javier@campus-017-091.ucdavis.edu>
vbraun pushed a commit that referenced this issue Oct 8, 2023
xuluze pushed a commit to xuluze/sage that referenced this issue Dec 12, 2023
…block_matrix_form, summand_matrices (sagemath#8)

* wip onesum

* wip onesum2

* wip onesum test

* onesum node example

* fixed names of .summand_matrices() and .block_matrix_form,
....: and added examples to ._children()

* style fixes

---------

Co-authored-by: J S <javier@javiers-mbp.mynetworksettings.com>
Co-authored-by: J S <javier@campus-017-091.ucdavis.edu>
xuluze pushed a commit to xuluze/sage that referenced this issue Feb 23, 2024
…block_matrix_form, summand_matrices (sagemath#8)

* wip onesum

* wip onesum2

* wip onesum test

* onesum node example

* fixed names of .summand_matrices() and .block_matrix_form,
....: and added examples to ._children()

* style fixes

---------

Co-authored-by: J S <javier@javiers-mbp.mynetworksettings.com>
Co-authored-by: J S <javier@campus-017-091.ucdavis.edu>
xuluze pushed a commit to xuluze/sage that referenced this issue Jun 10, 2024
…block_matrix_form, summand_matrices (sagemath#8)

* wip onesum

* wip onesum2

* wip onesum test

* onesum node example

* fixed names of .summand_matrices() and .block_matrix_form,
....: and added examples to ._children()

* style fixes

---------

Co-authored-by: J S <javier@javiers-mbp.mynetworksettings.com>
Co-authored-by: J S <javier@campus-017-091.ucdavis.edu>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

0 participants