Fixes for the push_to_docker_hub workflow #36385

soehms · 2023-10-02T06:56:33Z

This is a follow up PR of #36047. It does the following:

It fixes a wrong sort order for the tags that would cause a wrong tag for stable releases
It enables the push of the sagemath-dev:develop and sagemath-dev:latest tags according to my suggestion in New GitHub workflow to continue our images on Docker Hub #36047 (comment)
It implements improvements suggested by @saraedum in New GitHub workflow to continue our images on Docker Hub #36047.
It contains the upgrades from the auto-generated dependabot-branches for the Docker Hub GitHub App (dependabot/github_actions/docker/...). Thus, as soon as this PR is merged, these auto-generated branches can be deleted by a maintainer.

Still open is this suggestion from #36047 (comment):

Could we delete the gitlab setup in this PR as well? It's not working anymore anyway

@saraedum What should be deleted explicitly? .gitlab-ci.yml and the scripts used by it excludingly (.ci/protect-secrets.sh, .ci/describe-system.sh)? Other sources?

📝 Checklist

The title is concise, informative, and self-explanatory.
The description explains in detail what this PR is about.
I have linked a relevant issue or discussion.
I have created tests covering the changes.
I have updated the documentation accordingly.

⌛ Dependencies

github-actions · 2023-10-10T00:53:59Z

Documentation preview for this PR (built with commit 5e7a4e3; changes) is ready! 🎉

soehms · 2023-10-10T16:47:41Z

It would be desirable if this PR was merged by the next stable release. The current existing code would assign its images to a wrong tag (the last rc tag).

mkoeppe · 2023-10-10T17:33:54Z

docker/Dockerfile

@@ -75,7 +75,7 @@ ARG MAKE_BUILD=make-build
 ################################################################################
 # Image containing the run-time dependencies for Sage                          #
 ################################################################################
-FROM ubuntu:latest as run-time-dependencies
+FROM ubuntu:jammy as run-time-dependencies
 LABEL maintainer="Erik M. Bray <erik.bray@lri.fr>, Julian Rüth <julian.rueth@fsfe.org>"


I think your name should appear here now

I think your name should appear here now

Done! Thanks for reviewing!

mkoeppe

LGTM

@saraedum

This is a follow up PR of sagemath#36047. It does the following: 1. It fixes a wrong sort order for the tags that would cause a wrong tag for stable releases 2. It enables the push of the `sagemath-dev:develop` and `sagemath- dev:latest` tags according to my suggestion in sagemath#36047 (comment) 3. It implements improvements suggested by @saraedum in sagemath#36047. 4. It contains the upgrades from the auto-generated *dependabot- branches* for the Docker Hub GitHub App (`dependabot/github_actions/docker/...`). Thus, as soon as this PR is merged, these auto-generated branches can be deleted by a maintainer. Still open is this suggestion from sagemath#36047 (comment): > Could we delete the gitlab setup in this PR as well? It's not working anymore anyway @saraedum What should be deleted explicitly? `.gitlab-ci.yml` and the scripts used by it excludingly (`.ci/protect-secrets.sh`, `.ci/describe- system.sh`)? Other sources? ### 📝 Checklist     - [x] The title is concise, informative, and self-explanatory. - [x] The description explains in detail what this PR is about. - [x] I have linked a relevant issue or discussion. - [ ] I have created tests covering the changes. - [ ] I have updated the documentation accordingly. ### ⌛ Dependencies   URL: sagemath#36385 Reported by: Sebastian Oehms Reviewer(s): Matthias Köppe, Sebastian Oehms

saraedum · 2023-10-17T21:12:17Z

@saraedum What should be deleted explicitly? .gitlab-ci.yml and the scripts used by it excludingly (.ci/protect-secrets.sh, .ci/describe-system.sh)? Other sources?

Yes, these can be deleted.

@saraedum

This is a follow up PR of sagemath#36047. It does the following: 1. It fixes a wrong sort order for the tags that would cause a wrong tag for stable releases 2. It enables the push of the `sagemath-dev:develop` and `sagemath- dev:latest` tags according to my suggestion in sagemath#36047 (comment) 3. It implements improvements suggested by @saraedum in sagemath#36047. 4. It contains the upgrades from the auto-generated *dependabot- branches* for the Docker Hub GitHub App (`dependabot/github_actions/docker/...`). Thus, as soon as this PR is merged, these auto-generated branches can be deleted by a maintainer. Still open is this suggestion from sagemath#36047 (comment): > Could we delete the gitlab setup in this PR as well? It's not working anymore anyway @saraedum What should be deleted explicitly? `.gitlab-ci.yml` and the scripts used by it excludingly (`.ci/protect-secrets.sh`, `.ci/describe- system.sh`)? Other sources? ### 📝 Checklist     - [x] The title is concise, informative, and self-explanatory. - [x] The description explains in detail what this PR is about. - [x] I have linked a relevant issue or discussion. - [ ] I have created tests covering the changes. - [ ] I have updated the documentation accordingly. ### ⌛ Dependencies   URL: sagemath#36385 Reported by: Sebastian Oehms Reviewer(s): Matthias Köppe, Sebastian Oehms

soehms · 2023-10-18T17:25:57Z

@saraedum What should be deleted explicitly? .gitlab-ci.yml and the scripts used by it excludingly (.ci/protect-secrets.sh, .ci/describe-system.sh)? Other sources?

Yes, these can be deleted.

Thanks! I'll do this in another follow-up PR, which will be necessary since now the second job (which should push the micro_release to the sagemath tags) is failing due to a No space left on device error (see log of the 10.2.beta7 run).

soehms · 2023-10-25T17:38:16Z

which will be necessary since now the second job (which should push the micro_release to the sagemath tags) is failing due to a No space left on device error (see log of the 10.2.beta7 run).

Maybe this was just a temporary problem. The run for 10.2.beta8 was successful again. But it's still not clear to me what happened.

Before the 10.2.beta7 release the new workflow produced images of 9.9 GB for the make-build target and of 3.1 GB for the make-micro-release target (all uncompressed size).

The failure because of disk quota is amazing since there should be more than 25 GB available for the job. I could repeat the behavior when running the job for 10.2.beta7 in my own fork repository. What could be the reason for this? Maybe because the target make-micro-release is reached after an intermediate step make-all? From docker/Dockerfile:

################################################################################
# Image with a full build of sage, ready to release.                           #
################################################################################
FROM make-all as make-release
RUN make micro_release

or what purpose do we need make all for these images? Anyway, if I try to skip this using new target:

FROM $MAKE_BUILD as make-micro
RUN make micro_release

with

docker build --build-arg MAKEFLAGS... --build-arg MAKE_BUILD="sagemath/sagemath-dev:develop" -f docker/Dockerfile --target=make-micro --tag sage .

I'm getting an even larger image with 10.4 GB. Any ideas what I'm doing wrong here?

Furthermore: What could have increased the needed disk space for 10.2.beta7?

mkoeppe · 2023-10-25T19:36:53Z

Each RUN step in a Dockerfile creates a new filesystem layer. If you add files in one RUN step and remove them again in a following RUN step, the image size will not decrease.
In particular, when you create binaries in one RUN step and strip them in a following step, the resulting image will have both the unstripped binary and the stripped binary.

mkoeppe · 2023-10-25T19:41:28Z

The free space on GitHub runners is broken into several volumes; run df -h to check.
Operations executed by the Docker daemon typically use space somewhere in /var, which does not have very much space.
You can adjust it as we do in https://github.com/sagemath/sage/blob/develop/.github/workflows/docker.yml#L148

soehms · 2023-10-26T06:19:23Z

Each RUN step in a Dockerfile creates a new filesystem layer. If you add files in one RUN step and remove them again in a following RUN step, the image size will not decrease. In particular, when you create binaries in one RUN step and strip them in a following step, the resulting image will have both the unstripped binary and the stripped binary.

Thanks! That's reasonable!

soehms · 2023-10-26T06:20:58Z

The free space on GitHub runners is broken into several volumes; run df -h to check. Operations executed by the Docker daemon typically use space somewhere in /var, which does not have very much space.

That sounds reasonable, too. I guess that cached docker images are not cleared after a run.

You can adjust it as we do in https://github.com/sagemath/sage/blob/develop/.github/workflows/docker.yml#L148

Many thanks for the hint. I will include that step in the next PR.

soehms · 2023-11-13T19:17:08Z

@saraedum What should be deleted explicitly? .gitlab-ci.yml and the scripts used by it excludingly (.ci/protect-secrets.sh, .ci/describe-system.sh)? Other sources?

Yes, these can be deleted.

This will be done in #36716 !

soehms · 2023-11-13T19:18:29Z

The free space on GitHub runners is broken into several volumes; run df -h to check. Operations executed by the Docker daemon typically use space somewhere in /var, which does not have very much space. You can adjust it as we do in https://github.com/sagemath/sage/blob/develop/.github/workflows/docker.yml#L148

This is in #36716, as well!

…kflow      This PR implements the suggested changes of sagemath#36385. Furthermore, it enables the workflow to detect whether the current tag has already been pushed to Docker Hub. Thus, if the workflow run on pushing the tag fails due to a timeout this gives us the possibility to have a scheduler try for a second or third time (I add a cron for Tuesday and Thursday). Such timeouts (after 6 hours for a job) seem to happen sporadically, even though each of the both jobs usually succeeds in less than 4 hours. I also improve the code structure be refactoring to a reusable workflow `docker_hub.yml`. I tested the changes in my fork repository. To prevent from overriding the existing tags `10.2.rc0` and `develop` I temporarily changed the tag names to `10.2.rc0t` and `developt` for the test runs. Here is a [successful run](https://github.com/soehms/sage/actions/runs/6814399805) that created these tags on Docker Hub. To avoid confusion I've removed them again. A test-run on existing tags which should skip the subsequent steps is [this one](https://github.com/soehms/sage/actions/runs/6828167406). FYI: I also updated the [README](https://hub.docker.com/r/sagemath/sagemath) on Docker Hub. Please have a look and make corrections / additions there if necessary. ### 📝 Checklist     - [x] The title is concise, informative, and self-explanatory. - [x] The description explains in detail what this PR is about. - [x] I have linked a relevant issue or discussion. - [ ] I have created tests covering the changes. - [ ] I have updated the documentation accordingly. ### ⌛ Dependencies   URL: sagemath#36716 Reported by: Sebastian Oehms Reviewer(s): Matthias Köppe, Sebastian Oehms

soehms and others added 7 commits September 12, 2023 08:25

push_to_docker_hub initial

8f284bd

push_to_docker_hub_fixes complete TAG_LIST

3fa2df7

ush_to_docker_hub_fixes the missing one

abc14c9

Merge branch 'sagemath:develop' into push_to_docker_hub_fixes

dd2b7d7

dependabot upgrades

9ffa6e7

Merge branch 'sagemath:develop' into push_to_docker_hub_fixes

08d53f3

Merge branch 'sagemath:develop' into push_to_docker_hub_fixes

bf12120

soehms added c: build s: needs review labels Oct 2, 2023

soehms added this to the sage-10.2 milestone Oct 2, 2023

Merge branch 'sagemath:develop' into push_to_docker_hub_fixes

5e7a4e3

soehms requested review from saraedum and mkoeppe October 10, 2023 16:48

mkoeppe added the p: critical / 2 label Oct 10, 2023

mkoeppe reviewed Oct 10, 2023

View reviewed changes

mkoeppe approved these changes Oct 10, 2023

View reviewed changes

36385: add maintainer

b427e02

mkoeppe added s: positive review and removed s: needs review labels Oct 12, 2023

Merge branch 'sagemath:develop' into push_to_docker_hub_fixes

ca58150

soehms mentioned this pull request Oct 21, 2023

Revive sage live doc using jupyter-sphinx #36144

Merged

5 tasks

vbraun merged commit f909b0a into sagemath:develop Oct 21, 2023
14 of 21 checks passed

github-actions bot removed the s: positive review label Oct 21, 2023

soehms deleted the push_to_docker_hub_fixes branch October 21, 2023 21:14

soehms mentioned this pull request Nov 13, 2023

Free space and repeatability for the Docker Hub workflow #36716

Merged

5 tasks

Provide feedback

Saved searches

Use saved searches to filter your results more quickly

Fixes for the push_to_docker_hub workflow #36385

Fixes for the push_to_docker_hub workflow #36385

soehms commented Oct 2, 2023 •

edited

Loading

github-actions bot commented Oct 10, 2023

soehms commented Oct 10, 2023

mkoeppe Oct 10, 2023

soehms Oct 11, 2023

mkoeppe left a comment

saraedum commented Oct 17, 2023

soehms commented Oct 18, 2023

soehms commented Oct 25, 2023

mkoeppe commented Oct 25, 2023

mkoeppe commented Oct 25, 2023 •

edited

Loading

soehms commented Oct 26, 2023

soehms commented Oct 26, 2023

soehms commented Nov 13, 2023

soehms commented Nov 13, 2023

Fixes for the push_to_docker_hub workflow #36385

Fixes for the push_to_docker_hub workflow #36385

Conversation

soehms commented Oct 2, 2023 • edited Loading

📝 Checklist

⌛ Dependencies

github-actions bot commented Oct 10, 2023

soehms commented Oct 10, 2023

mkoeppe Oct 10, 2023

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

soehms Oct 11, 2023

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

mkoeppe left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

saraedum commented Oct 17, 2023

soehms commented Oct 18, 2023

soehms commented Oct 25, 2023

mkoeppe commented Oct 25, 2023

mkoeppe commented Oct 25, 2023 • edited Loading

soehms commented Oct 26, 2023

soehms commented Oct 26, 2023

soehms commented Nov 13, 2023

soehms commented Nov 13, 2023

soehms commented Oct 2, 2023 •

edited

Loading

mkoeppe commented Oct 25, 2023 •

edited

Loading