CODE_OF_CONDUCT.md: Do not send people to sage-flame
#37054
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
|
Citation needed; E.g. Hocquet & Wieber (doi:10.1080/24701475.2018.1456741) coin the term "fruitful trolling" implying that there are also some benefits to it. |
mkoeppe
force-pushed
the
remove-sage-flame
branch
from
55b1178
to
4feff64
Compare
|
Documentation preview for this PR (built with commit 4feff64; changes) is ready! 🎉 |
|
Thanks |
roed314
approved these changes
Feb 27, 2024
vbraun
pushed a commit
to vbraun/sage
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 30, 2024
- **Revise the code of conduct** <!-- ^ Please provide a concise and informative title. --> <!-- ^ Don't put issue numbers in the title, do this in the PR description below. --> <!-- ^ For example, instead of "Fixes sagemath#12345" use "Introduce new method to calculate 1 + 2". --> <!-- v Describe your changes below in detail. --> <!-- v Why is this change required? What problem does it solve? --> <!-- v If this PR resolves an open issue, please link to it here. For example, "Fixes sagemath#12345". --> Revise the code of conduct: add a diversity component and sections on reporting guidelines and how reports are handled. Also add a new document about the role of the Sage Code of Conduct Committee. The changes to the first document are based on similar documents from SciPy and NumFOCUS, plus inspiration and some language from the changes proposed at sagemath#36844. The second document is heavily based on the corresponding document from SciPy. Based on top of sagemath#37054. ### 📝 Checklist <!-- Put an `x` in all the boxes that apply. --> - [X] The title is concise and informative. - [X] The description explains in detail what this PR is about. - [X] I have linked a relevant issue or discussion. - [ ] I have created tests covering the changes. - [ ] I have updated the documentation accordingly. ### ⌛ Dependencies <!-- List all open PRs that this PR logically depends on. For example, --> <!-- - sagemath#12345: short description why this is a dependency --> sagemath#37054 URL: sagemath#37501 Reported by: John H. Palmieri Reviewer(s): Dima Pasechnik, John H. Palmieri, Kwankyu Lee, Matthias Köppe, nbruin, roed314, Tobias Diez
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Facts:
Here we remove the mention of sage-flame from the Code of Conduct; not only because it has fallen out of actual use, but also because it is harmful:
References:
📝 Checklist
⌛ Dependencies