-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 487
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Set partition to disjoint set #38693
Set partition to disjoint set #38693
Conversation
Documentation preview for this PR (built with commit 0761846; changes) is ready! 🎉 |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
otherwise LGTM.
{{0}, {1}, {2}, {3}, {4}} | ||
sage: DisjointSet(SP) == DisjointSet(5) | ||
True | ||
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
1 empty line is enough
src/sage/sets/disjoint_set.pyx
Outdated
@@ -103,6 +104,15 @@ cpdef DisjointSet(arg): | |||
sage: DisjointSet(['yi', 45, 'cheval']) | |||
{{'cheval'}, {'yi'}, {45}} | |||
|
|||
From a set partition:: |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
you could add a reference to the issue or the PR using (see :issue:`12345`)
Fixed. I also forgot that this issue handles #38416 by providing the alternative solution. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
go back to positive review after rebase
<!-- ^ Please provide a concise and informative title. --> <!-- ^ Don't put issue numbers in the title, do this in the PR description below. --> <!-- ^ For example, instead of "Fixes sagemath#12345" use "Introduce new method to calculate 1 + 2". --> <!-- v Describe your changes below in detail. --> <!-- v Why is this change required? What problem does it solve? --> <!-- v If this PR resolves an open issue, please link to it here. For example, "Fixes sagemath#12345". --> This issue fixes the bug in sagemath#38415 . It uses the base of `SetPartition` to allow a `DisjointSet` to be created in a nice way. This also solves issue sagemath#38416 ### 📝 Checklist <!-- Put an `x` in all the boxes that apply. --> - [x] The title is concise and informative. - [x] The description explains in detail what this PR is about. - [x] I have linked a relevant issue or discussion. - [x] I have created tests covering the changes. - [x] I have updated the documentation and checked the documentation preview. ### ⌛ Dependencies <!-- List all open PRs that this PR logically depends on. For example, --> <!-- - sagemath#12345: short description why this is a dependency --> <!-- - sagemath#34567: ... --> sagemath#38415 , sagemath#38416 URL: sagemath#38693 Reported by: Aram Dermenjian Reviewer(s): David Coudert
This issue fixes the bug in #38415 . It uses the base of
SetPartition
to allow aDisjointSet
to be created in a nice way. This also solves issue #38416📝 Checklist
⌛ Dependencies
#38415 , #38416