Consume nightly built Samba RPMs

[anoopcs9]

Fixes #45

[anoopcs9]

test-ad-server-kubernetes failed because we don't have AD DC components built with our nightly Samba RPMs. I'll enable and check.

[phlogistonjohn]

This looks very interesting, however I am not sure about adding the nightlies to our primary container file.
I think it would be better if we had additional contianer files like "Dockerfile.nightly" (as opposed to "Dockerfile.fedora") and then we could extend the Makefiles to push the nightly build based containers to an alternate tag. Perhaps something like "samba-server:next" or just "samba-server:nightly"

What do you think?

[anoopcs9]

This looks very interesting, however I am not sure about adding the nightlies to our primary container file. I think it would be better if we had additional contianer files like "Dockerfile.nightly" (as opposed to "Dockerfile.fedora") and then we could extend the Makefiles to push the nightly build based containers to an alternate tag. Perhaps something like "samba-server:next" or just "samba-server:nightly"

What do you think?

Make sense. I'll come up with the required changes.

[phlogistonjohn]

The dockerfile looks good, however I think a slightly different approach with the makefile would be better. Let me know what you think.

[phlogistonjohn]

Sorry for taking so long on this. Feel free to ping me in the future if I take more than a week to reply to a PR.
Anyway, one small change requested but everything else looks OK. In the future I think there's stuff we can do to perhaps minimize some duplication but I'd rather get this in now and deal with that later.

[phlogistonjohn]

LGTM, thanks a bunch!