Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Okta configuration #2199

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Dec 31, 2024
Merged

Okta configuration #2199

merged 3 commits into from
Dec 31, 2024

Conversation

usama9500
Copy link
Collaborator

@usama9500 usama9500 commented Dec 19, 2024

Added OKTA Configuration details

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features

    • Added documentation for configuring Okta as an OpenID Provider for SpiffWorkflow.
  • Documentation

    • Detailed steps for setting up OpenID authentication with Okta, including environment variable configuration and group claims integration.
    • Introduced a new entry in the documentation's table of contents for easy access to Okta configuration resources.

Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Dec 19, 2024

📝 Walkthrough
📝 Walkthrough

Walkthrough

The pull request introduces a new documentation file detailing the configuration process for integrating Okta as an OpenID Provider with SpiffWorkflow. The document provides comprehensive guidance on setting up OpenID authentication, including creating an OIDC application in Okta, configuring environment variables, and managing group claims. It covers the essential steps for establishing a connection between SpiffWorkflow and Okta, with specific instructions for setting up client credentials, environment configurations, and group authorization.

Changes

File Change Summary
docs/DevOps_installation_integration/okta_config.md New documentation file added for Okta OpenID Provider configuration in SpiffWorkflow
docs/index.md New entry added for DevOps_installation_integration/okta_config.md in the documentation table of contents

Sequence Diagram

sequenceDiagram
    participant User
    participant Okta
    participant SpiffWorkflow
    
    User->>Okta: Create OIDC Application
    Okta-->>User: Provide Client ID & Secret
    User->>SpiffWorkflow: Configure Environment Variables
    SpiffWorkflow->>Okta: Request Authentication
    Okta-->>SpiffWorkflow: Validate Token
    SpiffWorkflow-->>User: Grant Access
Loading

The sequence diagram illustrates the high-level authentication flow between the user, Okta, and SpiffWorkflow, showing the key steps of creating an OIDC application, configuring environment variables, and performing token-based authentication.


📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 4308ef9 and 5011705.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • docs/index.md (1 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
  • docs/index.md

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR. (Beta)
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 3

🧹 Nitpick comments (4)
docs/DevOps_installation_integration/okta_config.md (4)

1-4: Add prerequisites section for clarity.

Consider adding a prerequisites section that outlines:

  • Required access levels in Okta
  • Basic understanding of OpenID Connect
  • SpiffWorkflow backend requirements

8-10: Remove specific customer reference.

The mention of "Emerson" should be generalized as it's customer-specific information in public documentation.

-   - Note: For more complex enterprise setups (like Emerson), further Okta configurations may be required.
+   - Note: For complex enterprise setups, additional Okta configurations may be required.

64-67: Enhance AD integration examples.

Consider adding:

  1. Common troubleshooting scenarios
  2. Specific examples of group filter patterns
  3. Best practices for AD group naming conventions

71-74: Fix list indentation.

The unordered list items should have 2 spaces of indentation instead of 3.

 - Verify that groups are being passed to SpiffWorkflow:
-   - Run a test by logging in and inspecting the OpenID token (e.g., using a JWT decoder).
-   - Confirm that the group claims are being sent as part of the token payload.
+  - Run a test by logging in and inspecting the OpenID token (e.g., using a JWT decoder).
+  - Confirm that the group claims are being sent as part of the token payload.
🧰 Tools
🪛 Markdownlint (0.37.0)

72-72: Expected: 2; Actual: 3
Unordered list indentation

(MD007, ul-indent)


73-73: Expected: 2; Actual: 3
Unordered list indentation

(MD007, ul-indent)

📜 Review details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between e72f079 and aa79811.

⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
  • docs/DevOps_installation_integration/images/okta_config.png is excluded by !**/*.png
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • docs/DevOps_installation_integration/okta_config.md (1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 Markdownlint (0.37.0)
docs/DevOps_installation_integration/okta_config.md

72-72: Expected: 2; Actual: 3
Unordered list indentation

(MD007, ul-indent)


73-73: Expected: 2; Actual: 3
Unordered list indentation

(MD007, ul-indent)

docs/DevOps_installation_integration/okta_config.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
docs/DevOps_installation_integration/okta_config.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
docs/index.md (1)

76-76: LGTM! Consider organizing authentication-related documentation.

The addition of Okta configuration documentation is well-placed in the DevOps section. However, consider grouping all authentication-related documentation together (e.g., permissions, Okta) for better discoverability.

Consider:

  1. Creating an "Authentication & Authorization" subsection within DevOps
  2. Adding cross-references between related docs (permissions, Okta)
  3. Including a note in admin_and_permissions.md about Okta integration
📜 Review details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between aa79811 and 4308ef9.

📒 Files selected for processing (2)
  • docs/DevOps_installation_integration/okta_config.md (1 hunks)
  • docs/index.md (1 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
  • docs/DevOps_installation_integration/okta_config.md

@burnettk burnettk merged commit eaa2a0d into main Dec 31, 2024
20 checks passed
@burnettk burnettk deleted the okta_configuration branch December 31, 2024 14:23
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants